The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms
By Andrew P. Bradley. 1997
Subfields: Evaluation & Benchmarks
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Evaluation & Benchmarks
- Mohit Bansal
- Francisco Herrera
- Douwe Kiela
- David J. Hand
- Nitesh V. Chawla
- Tom Fawcett
- Foster J. Provost
- Salvador Garcia
Citations in the corpus
- The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memes (2020, background): “We recommend that people report the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) [6] as the main metric, but also report accuracy since the test set is balanced and that metric is easier to interpret.”
- Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networks (2019, methodology): “Specifically, in the chemistry datasets, we see from Table 1 that our Context Prediction + Graph-level multi-task supervised pre-training strategy gives the most promising performance, leading to an increase in average ROC-AUC of 7.2% over non-pre-trained baseline and 4.2% over graph-level multi-task”
- Mining with rarity: a unifying framework (2004, methodology): “Perhaps the most common is ROC analysis and the associated use of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to assess overall classification performance [4; 40].”
- Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: an evaluation of neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vector machines (2015, unknown): “5 is considered as random guessing (Bradley, 1997).”
- Error Metrics and Performance Fitness Indicators for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Engineering and Sciences (2020, background): “The ROC curve is plotted such that TPR is on vertical axis and FPR is on the horizontal axis (the line TPR = FPR represents a random guess of a specific class) [105].”
- Support Vector Data Description (2004, background): “The fraction of the outliers which is accepted (EII), is averaged over varying EI (Bradley, 1997):”
- Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms (2005, methodology): “Bradley [3] has compared popular machine learning algorithms using AUC and found that AUC exhibits several desirable properties compared to accuracy.”
- All-paths graph kernel for protein-protein interaction extraction with evaluation of cross-corpus learning (2008, background): “Due to this and other beneficial properties for comparative evaluation, the usage of AUC for performance evaluation has been recently advocated in the machine learning community (see e.g. [31]).”
- Membership Inference Attacks against Generative Models with Probabilistic Fluctuation (unknown): “As shown in Table 2, we first summarize the AUC [Bradley, 1997] and ASR [Duan et al. , 2023] metrics for all base-lines and PFAMI against two generative models over two datasets.”
- A Least-squares Approach to Direct Importance Estimation (2009, methodology): “Since there is a trade-off between the detection rate and the detection accuracy, we adopt the area under the ROC curve (AUC) as our error metric (Bradley, 1997).”