A Least-squares Approach to Direct Importance Estimation
By Takafumi Kanamori, Shohei Hido, Masashi Sugiyama. 2009
611 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Jun Zhu
- Jiaxin Shi
- Masashi Sugiyama
- Marco Loog
- Wouter M. Kouw
- Makoto Yamada
- Ofir Nachum
- Rauf Izmailov
Citations in the corpus
- GenDICE: Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Values (2020, background): “Classical density ratio estimation includes moment matching (Gretton et al., 2008), probabilistic classification (Bickel et al., 2007), and ratio matching (Nguyen et al., 2008; Sugiyama et al., 2008; Kanamori et al., 2009).”
- DualDICE: Behavior-Agnostic Estimation of Discounted Stationary Distribution Corrections (2019, methodology): “error), various direct ratio estimators have been proposed [37], including the moment matching approach [13], probabilistic classification approach [3, 5, 33], and ratio matching approach [17, 27, 38] The proposed DualDICE algorithm, as a direct approach for density ratio estimation, bears some simi”
- Watch and learn: Semi-supervised learning of object detectors from videos (2015, methodology): “Multiple feature spaces for false positive removal: We use the uLSIF [27] algorithm on Pyramidal HOG (PHOG) [4] and color histogram (LAB color with 32×16× 16 bins) features computed on a resized box of 200 × 300 px.”
- Domain Generalization by Marginal Transfer Learning (2017, background): “For example, several works adopt the covariate shift assumption, which requires the source and target domains to have the same posterior, allowing the marginals to differ arbitrarily (Zadrozny, 2004; Huang et al., 2007; Cortes et al., 2008; Sugiyama et al., 2008; Bickel et al., 2009; Kanamori et al.”
- Density-ratio matching under the Bregman divergence: a unified framework of density-ratio estimation (2012, methodology): “This is the solution of the approximation method called unconstrained LSIF (uLSIF; Kanamori et al. 2009).”
- An introduction to domain adaptation and transfer learning (2018, background): “One could also minimize the squared error between the estimated weights and the actual ratio of distributions [116,115]:”
- Change-Point Detection in Time-Series Data by Relative Density-Ratio Estimation (2012, methodology): “uLSIF has some notable advantages: Its solution can be computed analytically (Kanamori et al., 2009) and it possesses the optimal non-parametric convergence rate (Kanamori et al.”
- Domain Adaptation by Joint Distribution Invariant Projections (2020, background): “(5) is a popular choice for approximating unknown target functions in statistical machine learning [56]–[58].”
- A Bi-Hemisphere Domain Adversarial Neural Network Model for EEG Emotion Recognition (2021, methodology): “…including the methods of Kullback-Leibler importance estimation procedure (KLIEP) [41], unconstrained least-squares importance fitting (ULSIF) [42], selective transfer machine (STM) [43], linear SVM [37], kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) [44], transfer component analysis (TCA) [45],…”
- Conditional Density Estimation via Least-Squares Density Ratio Estimation (2010, methodology): “LS-CDE can be regarded as an application of the direct density-ratio estimation method called the unconstrained LeastSquares Importance Fitting (uLSIF) (Kanamori et al., 2009) to the problem of density ratio estimation.”
- Constructive setting for problems of density ratio estimation (2015, methodology): “The optimization problem in (27) has a structure similar to that of the unconstrained Least-Squares Importance Fitting (uLSIF) method [9], where, instead of V′′ n×n and Vn× , one uses identity matrices In×n and In× , and, instead of regularization functional α K α, one uses α α.”
- Likelihood-free inference with an improved cross-entropy estimator (2018, methodology): “This problem has prompted the development of likelihood-free inference methods such as Approximate Bayesian Computation [1–4] and neural density or neural density ratio estimation algorithms [5–23].”
- Transfer String Kernel for Cross-Context DNA-Protein Binding Prediction (2016, background): “Several recent papers [25], [34], [35] aim to estimate the optimal weights by solving least-square based formulations.”
- Implicit Variational Inference with Kernel Density Ratio Fitting (2017, methodology): “Based on the intuition, we apply a kernel density ratio fitting (KDRF) method similar to the unconstrained Least Square Importance Fitting (uLSIF) (Kanamori et al., 2009).”