States and Markets in an Era of Globalization
By S. O. Riain. 2000
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48d02dfcc847f384ed255d1f73c3f7ab3c70c24e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Global Strategic Partnerships between MNEs and NGOs: Drivers of Change and Ethical Issues (2004, background): “Toyne and Nigh (1998) call for international business researchers to look more directly at the behavioral and social sciences such as psychology and sociology and less at mainstream Anglo-Saxon economics, which tends to separate business processes from society (Toyne and Nigh, 1997, 1998; O’Riain, 2”
- The Consequences of Economic Globalization for Affluent Democracies (2007, background): “…investment inflows have been greater than outflows, and portfolio investment has been larger than direct investment most years since 1991. studies.4 We emphasize research that has appeared since 1999, mainly after other recent reviews were published (Guillén 2001, Ó Riain 2000, Berger 2000).”
- The Neoliberal Food Regime: Neoregulation and the New Division of Labor in North America. (2010, background): “Nation–states with the greatest international clout will be most influential in setting up the global regulatory regime, around which less powerful nation–states will need to strategize and adapt (Ó Riain 2000; Weiss 1997).”
- Corporate Governance Deviance (2016, unknown): “Indeed, O’Riain (2000) combines these three pillars to identify four types of national economies: a liberal type that promotes market dominance, a social rights type that sets social limits to market strategies, a developmental type in which market strategies are coordinated by the state and…”