CEO Compensation and Firm Performance in Japan: Evidence from New Panel Data on Individual CEO Pay

By Takao Kato, Katsuyuki Kubo. 2006

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Executive Compensation, Firm Performance, and Corporate Governance in China: Evidence from Firms Listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges (2006, unknown): “48 See, e.g., Kaplan (1994), Kubo (2004), and Kato and Kubo (2006) for Japan; Kato et al. (2006) for Korea.”
Directors' remuneration and performance in Australian banking (2007, unknown): “Murphy (1985), Jensen and Murphy (1990), Gregg, Machin and Szymanski (1993) and Conyon (1997), all found that firm size to be an important control variable influencing managers’ compensation levels.”
Executive Compensation: A Survey of Theory and Evidence (2017, unknown): “For most countries, this forced researchers to rely on industry surveys (Abowd and Boggano, 1995; Abowd and Kaplan, 1999; Murphy, 1999; Kato and Kubo, 2006; Thomas, 2009; Fabbri and Marin, 2016), to focus on only the cash component of pay (Kato and Rockel, 1992; Conyon and Schwalbach, 2000), or to…”
The impact of corporate governance on corporate performance: Evidence from Japan (2008, background): “The different categories that are distinguished in the GMI data set are board 1 See, for example, Kang and Shivdasani (1995), Kaplan and Minton (1994), Kato and Kubo (2006), and Morck et al. (2000).”