Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women 70 years of age or older with early breast cancer.

By L. Schnaper, D. Berry, C. Cirrincione, Thomas J Smith, Barbara L. Smith, C. Shapiro. New England Journal of Medicine, 2004

1,025 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BACKGROUND In women 70 years of age or older who have early breast cancer, it is unclear whether lumpectomy plus tamoxifen is as effective as lumpectomy followed by tamoxifen plus radiation therapy. METHODS Between July 1994 and February 1999, we randomly assigned 636 women who were 70 years of age or older and who had clinical stage I (T1N0M0 according to the tumor-node-metastasis classification), estrogen-receptor-positive breast carcinoma treated by lumpectomy to receive tamoxifen plus radiation therapy (317 women) or tamoxifen alone (319 women). Primary end points were the time to local or regional recurrence, the frequency of mastectomy for recurrence, breast-cancer-specific survival, the time to distant metastasis, and overall survival. RESULTS The only significant difference between the two groups was in the rate of local or regional recurrence at five years (1 percent in the group given tamoxifen plus irradiation and 4 percent in the group given tamoxifen alone, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the rates of mastectomy for local recurrence, distant metastases, or five-year rates of overall survival (87 percent in the group given tamoxifen plus irradiation and 86 percent in the tamoxifen group, P=0.94). Assessment by physicians and patients of cosmetic results and adverse events uniformly rated tamoxifen plus irradiation inferior to tamoxifen alone. CONCLUSIONS Lumpectomy plus adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen alone is a realistic choice for the treatment of women 70 years of age or older who have early, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/485a7ef3c4dfe226fabe009293c9c3f5c655adbf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. E. Senkus
  2. A. Goldhirsch
  3. S. Kyriakides
  4. W. Wood
  5. A. Coates
  6. S. Ohno
  7. K. Hughes
  8. R. Gelber

Citations in the corpus