The melting lines of model systems calculated from coexistence simulations

By James R. Morris, Xueyu Song. 2002

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4841d1f5ae90821ca776068aaadba6842e9e7009

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Salvatore Torquato
2. Deyan Sun
3. Frank H. Stillinger
4. Seungwu Han
5. Graeme J. Ackland
6. David J. Srolovitz
7. Mark Asta
8. M. Mendelev

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Salvatore Torquato
2. Frank H. Stillinger
3. Mark Asta

In Materials Chemistry

1. Salvatore Torquato
2. Frank H. Stillinger
3. Aleksandar Donev
4. M. Mendelev
5. David J. Srolovitz
6. Mark Asta
7. Stephen R. Williams
8. C. Royall

Citations in the corpus

• Development of new interatomic potentials appropriate for crystalline and liquid iron (2003, methodology): “To find the melting point corresponding to the EAM potential from the paper by Ackland et al. (1997), we performed a series of simulations based on the so-called coexistence approach (Morris et al. 1994, Morris and Song 2002).”
• Neighbor list collision-driven molecular dynamics simulation for nonspherical hard particles. (2005, background): “Unfortunately, direct coexistence is very difficult to observe in computer simulations, and requires the creation of an artificial interface between the two phases [27].”