The effects of artificial substrates on freshwater pond productivity and water quality and the implications for periphyton-based aquaculture

By M. E. Azim, M. A. Wahab, M. Verdegem, A. A. Dam, J. M. Rooij, M. Beveridge. 2002

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47dd241a06be17acdee717a58b4ce3de9202f47e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. R. Crab
2. W. Verstraete
3. Peter Bossier
4. T. Defoirdt
5. M. E. Azim
6. M. Verdegem
7. M. Beveridge
8. A. V. van Dam

In Environmental Chemistry

1. Y. Avnimelech

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. E. Azim
2. R. Crab
3. W. Verstraete
4. M. Verdegem
5. Peter Bossier
6. M. Beveridge
7. A. V. van Dam
8. Y. Avnimelech

Citations in the corpus

• Nitrogen removal techniques in aquaculture for a sustainable production (2007, methodology): “The yield is around 4 g dry matter/m2 day and the protein content of periphyton is around 25% of the dry matter (Azim et al., 2002, 2005).”
• The potential of fish production based on periphyton (2002, background): “There seemed to be an effect of substrate type on the nutritional quality of the periphyton, with bamboo substrates giving better quality periphyton than jutestick and branches of the hizol tree (Azim et al., 2002b).”