One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described
By F. Richard, C. F. Bond, Juli J. Stokes-Zoota. 2003
1,429 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47bb2d8265e3631b729cec3990b331634b2eebdc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- D. Funder
- Marco Perugini
- A. Liefländer
- Felix D. Schönbrodt
- J. Rodgers
- P. Shrout
- L. Jussim
- Piers Steel
In Sociology and Political Science
- Timothy R. Levine
- A. Liefländer
- Maria Hartwig
- D. Funder
- Marco Perugini
- Franz Xaver Bogner
- Piers Steel
- C. Capaldi
Citations in the corpus
- Accuracy of Deception Judgments (2006, background): “From a large-scale compilation, Richard, Bond, and Stokes-Zoota (2003) developed empirical guidelines for evaluating effect sizes.”
- The Unbearable Accuracy of Stereotypes (2009, methodology): “It is among the smallest effects found in social psychology (Richard et al., 2003).”
- Which Behaviors Do Attitudes Predict? Meta-Analyzing the Effects of Social Pressure and Perceived Difficulty (2005, neutral): “Th is a rti cl e is in te nd ed so le ly fo r t he p er so na l u se o f t he in di vi du al u se r a nd is n ot to b e di ss em in at ed b ro ad ly . to average effect sizes in 322 social psychological meta-analyses summarized by Richard et al. (2003).”
- Death Goes to the Polls: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Effects on Political Attitudes* (2013, background): “To put this overall effect size into context, Richard, Bond, and Stokes-Zoota (2003) compiled results from a century of social psychological research—more than 25,000 studies involving eight million participants—and found that the mean effect size was r (473) = .21 (SD = .15).”