Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases

1,034 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. (2014, background): “Disagreement on the choice of outcome measures has resulted in inconsistent reporting, potential for reporting bias, and reduced quality of guidelines depending on such trial results [2,3].”