Sabotage in contests: a survey
By Subhasish M. Chowdhury, Oliver Gürtler. Public Choice, 2015
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A contest is a situation in which individuals expend irretrievable resources to win valuable prize(s). “Sabotage” is a deliberate and costly act of damaging a rival’s likelihood of winning the contest. Sabotage can be observed in, e.g., sports, war, promotion tournaments, and political or marketing campaigns. In this article, we provide a model of, and different perspectives on, such sabotage activities and review the economics literature analyzing the act of sabotage in contests. We discuss the theories and evidence emphasizing the means of sabotage, why sabotage occurs, and the effects of sabotage on individual contestants and on overall welfare, with possible means of reducing sabotage. We note that most sabotage activities are aimed at the ablest contestant, the possibility of sabotage reduces productive effort exerted by the contestants, and sabotage may lessen the effectiveness of public policies, such as affirmative action, or information revelation in contests. We discuss the different policies a designer might use to counteract sabotage. We conclude by pointing out some areas of future research.
Subfields: Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/479578d9603cca457fad127dbfa27b4f4f16f032
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Tournament Incentives and Corporate Fraud (2015, background): “We also follow prior literature and 15 See Appendix 1 for a complete description of and the formula for our option intensity measure. compare fraud firms against a sample of non-fraud firms matched by size, industry, and year (e.g., Erickson, Hanlon, and Maydew, 2006).”