The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements

By Yuki Kamide, Gerry T. M. Altmann, S. Haywood. 2003

916 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47759c5d28e38d61cd288d6a52227bee7c30fdb1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese (2015, background): “At the same time, it has been found that case-marking can guide comprehenders’ expectations during sentence processing (Kamide et al., 2003; Kim, 1999; Yamashita, 1997).”
Language as shaped by the brain. (2008, background): “In a series of linguistic and corpus-based analyses, Bybee (2007) has shown how frequency of occurrence plays an important role in shaping language from phonology to morphology to morphosyntax, due to the effects of repeated processing experiences with specific examples (either types or tokens).”
Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world (2016, neutral): “, 2003; Mani & Huettig, 2012, 2014) and mature (e.g., Altmann & Kamide, 1999; DeLong, Urbach & Kutas, 2005; Kamide et al., 2003; van Berkum, Brown, Kooijman, Zwitserlood, & Hagoort, 2005) language users anticipate upcoming language input.”
The communicative function of ambiguity in language. (2011, neutral): “…linguistic context (Frazier, 1979; Jurafsky, 1996; Gibson, 1998; McDonald & Shillcock, 2003; Frisson, Rayner, & Pickering, 2005; Levy, 2008), or more global world knowledge (Trueswell, Tanenhaus, & Garnsey, 1994; Altmann & Kamide, 1999; Kamide, Altmann, & Haywood, 2003) in disambiguating language.”
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? (2015, background): “…Kamide, 1999; Paczynski & Kuperberg, 2012), the tense of a preceding verb (Altmann & Kamide, 2007), the combination of a specific verb and argument (Kamide et al., 2003; Matsuki et al., 2011; Metusalem et al., 2012; Paczynski & Kuperberg, 2012), preverbal arguments (Bornkessel-Schlesewsky &…”
The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials (2005, background): “This proposal appears consistent with head-mounted eye-tracking studies showing ‘‘anticipatory’’ interpretation (Kamide et al., 2003) as well as lexical 6 Townsend and Bever (2001) propose a model that is similar in many respects.”
On the Meaning of Words and Dinosaur Bones: Lexical Knowledge Without a Lexicon (2009, background): “…of the trend that has appeared not only in the processing literature (e.g., in addition to the studies cited above, Altmann & Kamide, 2007; Kamide et al., 2003; Kamide, Scheepers, & Altmann, 2003; van Berkum et al., 2005; van Berkum, Zwitserlood, Hagoort, & Brown, 2003) but also many…”
The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic (2013, neutral): “…there is ample independent evidence that the comprehension system anticipates upcoming material in at least some situations (Altmann & Kamide, 1999; DeLong et al., 2005; Kamide et al., 2003; Kamide, Scheepers, & Altmann, 2003; Knoeferle et al., 2005; Van Berkum et al., 2005; Wicha et al., 2003).”
Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density (2010, result): “This links the results reported here to findings suggesting that syntactic comprehension is probability-sensitive (Hale, 2001; Hale, 2003; Jurafsky, 1996; Kamide et al., 2003; Levy, 2008; MacDonald, 1994; McDonald & Shillcock, 2003; Staub & Clifton, 2006; Trueswell, 1996).”
The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing (2007, methodology): “Verbs also drive eye movements (and more specifically, anticipatory eye movements), and they can do so whether alone (‘the boy will eat the cake’ engendering looks towards the one edible object at ‘eat’; Altmann & Kamide, 1999), whether with their subject (‘the girl will ride .. .’ engendering looks”