Trade Patterns and Global Value Chains in East Asia: From Trade in Goods to Trade in Tasks
By Ide-Jetro. 2011
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/474c86038d73993be5d60de6455a2f7eb56700ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Joonkoo Lee
- Arnold Tukker
- Gary Gereffi
- E. Dietzenbacher
- D. Elms
- Patrick Kim Cheng Low
- Manfred Lenzen
- Henry S. C. Yeung
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Why the World Suddenly Cares About Global Supply Chains (2012, background): “Governments and international organizations are taking notice of this emerging pattern of global trade, which is being called a shift from “trade in goods” to “trade in value added” and “trade in tasks” (OECD 2011; WTO and IDE-JETRO 2011).”
- GLOBAL MULTIREGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT FRAMEWORKS: AN INTRODUCTION AND OUTLOOK (2013, background): “Recently, IDE-JETRO and the World Trade Organisation (WTO) jointly proposed ‘trade in value added’ as a better approach for the measurement for international trade (see WTO and IDE-JETRO, 2011).”
- Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world (2014, background): “…peak organizations concerned with economic development, including the World Bank (Webber and Labaste, 2009; Cattaneo et al., 2010), the WTO (WTO and IDE-JETRO, 2011), the OECD (OECD, 2011; Beltramello et al., 2012), the International Labour Organization (ILO) (Gereffi, 2006), the US Agency for…”
- Global value chains in a changing world (2013, background): “1 The authors are economists at the International Trade Commission. This paper reflects solely the views of the authors and is not meant to represent the views of the US International Trade Commission or any of its Commissioners. We thank Zhi Wang for his valuable contributions and discussions, but ”