Twenty Years of University Report Cards

By N. Dyke. 2005

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

International University Ranking Systems and the Idea of University Excellence (2007, background): “Some commentators (Van Dyke 2005, pp. 107–8; Clarke 2005, p. 191) have noted that an inevitable source of ‘subjectivity’ in ranking systems is that a choice must be made about how much weight to give the various criteria of assessment the system uses.”
Global University Rankings: Implications in general and for Australia (2007, background): “The CHE ranking system has also received positive responses from scholars in the English-speaking world (Van Dyke, 2005; Usher & Savino, 2006).”
Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Critical Review (2008, background): “In Australia there is the Melbourne Institute index of the international standing of Australian universities (Williams & Van Dyke, 2005).”
Anchoring effects in world university rankings: exploring biases in reputation scores (2011, background): “…McDonough et al. 1998), inappropriateness of the instrument for external decision making (Dill and Soo 2005; Hazelkorn 2008; Salmi and Saroyan 2007) and substantial concerns about the validity and reliability of rankings (Bowden 2000; Kroth and Daniel 2008; Tight 2000; Turner 2005; Van Dyke 2005).”