A semi-recirculating, integrated system for the culture of fish and seaweed

By Andreas Schuenhoff, M. Shpigel, I. Lupatsch, A. Ashkenazi, F. Msuya, A. Neori. 2003

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4728c8463c5fae442cc4ad0ac3d6eabac2798627

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. C. Yarish
2. A. Buschmann
3. A. Neori
4. Andreas Schuenhoff
5. Y. Olsen
6. Xinxin Wang
7. K. Reitan
8. T. Chopin

In Global and Planetary Change

1. C. Yarish
2. A. Buschmann
3. A. Neori
4. K. Reitan
5. Xinxin Wang
6. T. Chopin
7. Y. Olsen
8. Andreas Schuenhoff

Citations in the corpus

• High rate algal pond treatment for water reuse in a marine fish recirculation system: Water purification and fish health (2006, background): “The red seaweed, F. rufolanosa, was found as an excellent biofilter for temperate latitudes and colder water as well easily tank-cultivated and fast growing (A. Schuenhoff et al., 2003).”
• Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture (2004, background): “When expressed on a percent dry weight basis, maximal values for Ulva, Gracilaria and Porphyra grown in the eutrophic conditions characteristic of fish farm effluent range between 5–7% as N in dw or 30–45% as protein in dw (Neori et al., 2000; Carmona et al., 2001; Schuenhoff et al., 2003).”
• Suitability of three red macroalgae as a feed for the abalone Haliotis tuberculata coccinea Reeve (2005, background): “In an aquaculture integrated system, nitrogenous enriched waste water of intensively cultured organisms such as fish, shrimp, and abalone may be transformed into a valuable algal biomass, seaweeds production being an added income as feed for shellfish (Evans and Langdon, 2000; Schuenhoff et al., 200”
• Cultivating the Macroalgal Holobiont: Effects of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture on the Microbiome of Ulva rigida (Chlorophyta) (2020, background): “Benefits were also highlighted in land-based IMTAs, such as high productivity and reduced variability of the protein content of macroalgae, which were related to the constant supply of nutrients between the different compartments in culture and reduced grazing of the algae (Schuenhoff et al., 2003; ”
• Improving gonad colour and somatic index in the European sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (2005, background): “conferta cultured from fish pond effluents in the IOLR integrated system (Cohen and Neori, 1991; Schuenhoff et al., 2003).”
• The tetrasporophyte of Asparagopsis armata as a novel seaweed biofilter (2006, background): “3; night data) and Ulva (Mata and Santos, 2003; Schuenhoff et al., 2003) showed significant night removal rates around 6 μmol l h.”
• Experimental integrated aquaculture of fish and red seaweeds in Northern Portugal (2006, methodology): “According to data obtained for Ulva lactuca, a species considered a good biofilter, 5174 m would be necessary to achieve the same 50% of N removal (Schuenhoff et al., 2003).”
• Growing Ulva (Chlorophyta) in integrated systems as a commercial crop for abalone feed in South Africa: a SWOT analysis (2009, background): “Parker 1981; De Busk et al. 1986; Neori et al. 1991, 2000, 2003; Israel et al. 1993), including integrated multi-trophic systems where Ulva culture is combined with aquaculture of marine animals (Cohen and Neori 1991; Jimenez del Rio et al. 1996; Neori et al. 1996, 1998, 2000 ;N eori and Shpigel1999”
• A novel three-stage seaweed (Ulva lactuca) biofilter design for integrated mariculture (2003, background): “…protein yield relative to the results from TAN analyses are also probably due to seaweed loss through the outflow screens, coupled with minor nitrificationdenitrification processes that developed in the system over time (Dvir et al., 1999; Schuenhoff, 2001); both issues deserve a continuing study.”
• Biofiltering efficiency, uptake and assimilation rates of Ulva clathrata (Roth) J. Agardh (Clorophyceae) cultivated in shrimp aquaculture waste water (2009, background): “…yields of Ulva species can be further enhanced by continuous effluent flow with a higher exchange rate and higher aeration (Lüning and Pang 2003; Neori et al. 2003; Schuenhoff et al. 2003) than that applied in the present study, to improve both water movement and inorganic nutrients acquisition.”
• Bioremediation potential of the macroalga Gracilaria lemaneiformis (Rhodophyta) integrated into fed fish culture in coastal waters of north China (2006, background): “Maximal N percentages for Gracilaria, Porphyra and Ulva cultured in fish effluents range between 5% and 7% (Neori et al., 2000; Carmona et al., 2001; Schuenhoff et al., 2003).”
• Discharge of nutrient wastes from salmon farms: environmental effects, and potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (2012, background): “In addition, the N and dry matter content in seaweed co-cultured with fish farm effluents can vary quite pronouncedly (Carmona et al. 2001, Porrello et al. 2003, Schuenhoff et al. 2003, Yang et al. 2006), which would affect our estimated potentials.”
• Integrated seaweed cultivation on an abalone farm in South Africa (2008, background): “Schuenhoff et al. (2003) found that water re-circulated through seaweed tanks raised dissolved oxygen levels and that this could support fish-tanks without additional oxygen “at times of highest oxygen demand”.”