Social Enterprise : At the crossroads of markets, public policies and civil society

By Marthe Nyssens. 2006

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4720880cfe668f8003f8a67242648ea3383416bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Prevalence and Determinants of Social Entrepreneurship at the Macro Level (2016, background): “…authors argue that a relationship of partnership and interdependence characterizes the European situation where governments seek more efficient or effective ways to address public goals by contracting out with social mission organizations (Borzaga and Defourny 2001; Nyssens 2006; Young 2008).”
Measuring Performance in Social Enterprises (2011, background): “(Borzaga & Defourny, 2001; Kerlin, 2006; Nyssens, 2006)—the related performance measurement systems necessarily assume multiple profiles.”
Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Citation/Co-citation Analysis (2019, unknown): “(2014), Galera and Borzaga (2009), Kerlin (2006), Kerlin (2010), Nyssens (2006), Parkinson and Howorth (2008), Pearce (2003), Ridley- Duff and Bull (2011), Teasdale (2012), Yunus et al.”
Negotiating Tensions: How Do Social Enterprises in the Homelessness Field Balance Social and Commercial Considerations? (2012, background): “A major study on work integration social enterprises employing or training disadvantaged groups found they faced considerable pressure to cream off the least disadvantaged to reduce costs (Nyssens, 2006).”
The EMES Approach of Social Enterprise in a Comparative Perspective (2012, background): “…several EMES researches, in different industries, such as personal services or local development (Borzaga and Defourny 2001) or work integration (Nyssens 2006; Davister et al. 2004), sometimes enlarged to Central and Eastern Europe (Borzaga et al. 2008) or non-EU countries, like Switzerland and…”
Social enterprise in Europe: At the crossroads of market, public policies and third sector (2010, methodology): “However, one major type of social enterprise is clearly dominant across Europe, namely ‘‘work integration social enterprises’’ (WISEs) (Nyssens, 2006).”
Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda (2014, background): “By pursuing financial and social aims, SEs are thus a classic example of hybrid organizations (Billis 2010; Dees and Elias 1998; Defourny and Nyssens 2006; Evers 2005; Liu and Ko 2012; Murphy and Coombes 2009; Pache and Santos 2010; Young 2001) in that they combine properties associated with…”
Research on entrepreneurship in the informal economy: Framing a research agenda (2013, background): “Community entrepreneurship highlights the use of networks of individuals committed to the community good, although not necessarily for profit (Nyssens, 2006).”
Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments (2008, background): “The concept of social economy is used almost as an equivalent to the concept of social enterprise, but with a lesser focus on democratic ownership or ownership not based on capital than the notion of social enterprise such as defined by EMES (Defourny, 2001, quoted by Nyssens, 2006).”
Emerging models of social enterprise in Eastern Asia: a cross‐country analysis (2011, background): “…of the Western European landscape of social enterprises is relying on market or quasi-market mechanisms, although the very distinctive feature of social enterprise in that region is its central place in the graph, “at the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society” (Nyssens, 2006).”
Social Entrepreneurship: Definitions, Drivers, and Challenges (2012, background): “For government, social entrepreneurship (particularly in the form of social enterprises) can be one of the solutions to state failures in welfare provision (Leadbeater 1996; Nyssens 2006).”