Cognitive Neuroscience: Tracking the time course of object categorization using event-related potentials
By James W. Tanaka, P. Luu, Matthias Weisbrod, Markus Kiefer. 1999
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Bruno Rossion
- John J. Foxe
- Simon J. Thorpe
- Sophie Molholm
- Rufin VanRullen
- Walter Ritter
- Daniel C. Javitt
- Carrie A. Joyce
Citations in the corpus
- Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex (2003, background): “In any case, hemispheric differences and orientation effects arose later than this P1 component, at the level of the N170.”
- Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? Ultra-Rapid Visual Categorisation of Natural and Artifactual Objects (2001, background): “Indeed, numerous experiments have shown an advantage for categorisation of images at the basic versus superordinate level (Rosch et al 1976), although other studies have reported that this advantage could decrease when objects are presented in whole scenes (Murphy and Wisniewski 1989), and ERP recor”
- Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. (2004, background): “It has, for example, been repeatedly shown to reflect visual processing of the structural features of objects (e.g. Bentin et al., 1999; Tanaka et al., 1999; Eimer, 2000; Rossion et al., 2000; Murray et al., 2002; but see Vogel and Luck, 2000).”