Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks

By Samir R Das, C. Perkins, Elizabeth M. Belding-Royer. Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064), 2000

2,414 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46d94602cfe764371211742eb87c9eb16244851f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

Citations in the corpus

Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing (2001, methodology): “We have veri ed that our integration of the CMU's ad hoc routing reproduces their results [5], and that our simulation results of unmodi ed ad hoc protocols are consistent with other published results [5, 10, 15].”
Architecture and evaluation of an unplanned 802.11b mesh network (2005, background): “MANETs have been extensively studied [10, 19, 12], but their routing protocol design is focused on coping with rapid topology changes due to mobility.”
Capacity of Ad Hoc wireless networks (2001, background): “[4] observe that in a simulated network of 100 nodes, each with a 2 Mbps radio, the throughput available to each node is on the order of a few kilobits per second.”
On-demand multipath distance vector routing in ad hoc networks (2001, methodology): “Note that the same simulation environment has been used before in several recent performance studies on ad hoc networks [3, 15, 17, 9 ]. In our simulations, we use the latest AODV specification [31].”
On the minimum node degree and connectivity of a wireless multihop network (2002, methodology): “A very popular and frequently used mobility model in ad hoc networking research is the random waypoint model (see, e.g., [27, 28, 29 , 30]).”
Query Processing in Sensor Networks (2003, background): “Research of routing in ad-hoc wireless networks has a long history [17, 29], and a plethora of papers has been published on routing protocols for ad-hoc mobile wireless networks [24, 16, 5, 25, 23, 8, 15].”
PATHS: analysis of PATH duration statistics and their impact on reactive MANET routing protocols (2003, background): “[11], [13], [2], [12] and [4] give a very good exposition of this subject.”
Ad hoc on-demand multipath distance vector routing (2002, methodology): “This simulator has been used for evaluating performance of earlier versions of the AODV protocol (e.g., References [20, 22 ]).”
The Node Distribution of the Random Waypoint Mobility Model for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks (2003, methodology): “Such settings have been used, for instance, in the evaluation of routing ([11], [12], [18], [20], [21], [32]), multicast [27], and energy-conserving [33] protocols.”
Gossip-based ad hoc routing (2002, methodology): “We used the same configuration parameters for AODV as those used in [5].”
Performance of route caching strategies in Dynamic Source Routing (2001, methodology): “Mobility and traffic models are similar to previous reported results using this simulator [2, 9, 3].”
Supporting cooperative caching in ad hoc networks (2004, background): “Most of the previous research [7], [11], [12], [25] in ad hoc networks focuses on the development of dynamic routing protocols that can efficiently find routes between two communicating nodes.”
A survey of QoS routing solutions for mobile ad hoc networks (2007, neutral): “Example of use: [29]; • Network lifetime (s) -may be defined as the time until network partitioning occurs due to node failure [20], or the time until a specified proportion of nodes fail.”
Scalable routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks (2002, background): “Interested readers are referred to papers [4], [5], [22] for performance evaluation.”
IMPORTANT: a framework to systematically analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing Protocols for Adhoc Networks (2003, methodology): “[ 7 ] performed a comparison study of the two on-demand routing protocols: DSR and AODV, using the performance metrics of packet delivery ratio and end to end delay.”