Query Processing in Sensor Networks
By Yong Yao, Johannes Gehrke. 2003
1,025 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Charu C. Aggarwal
- Suman Nath
- Lukasz Golab
- Samuel Madden
- Phillip B. Gibbons
- M. Tamer Özsu
- Amol Deshpande
- Carlos Guestrin
Citations in the corpus
- Over-the-air Function Computation in Sensor Networks (2016, background): “(a) Aggregated Wireless Sensor Networks : Most data aggregation work can be classified as: tree-based [17, 26, 16, 13], cluster-based [12, 27, 30, 18] or multipath [20, 19, 7].”
- Synopsis diffusion for robust aggregation in sensor networks (2004, methodology): “A popular approach used by sensor database systems [20, 27] is to construct a spanning tree in the network, rooted at the querying node, and then perform innetwork aggregation along the tree.”
- Gossip-based computation of aggregate information (2003, background): “our physical environment with sensor networks consisting of hundreds of thousands of small sensor nodes [24, 28, 35].”
- Distributed regression: an efficient framework for modeling sensor network data (2004, background): “Adaptive Sampling. Rather than delivering samples at a continuous rate, as most sensor-network query systems propose (Mad03; YG03 ), our approach allows nodes to locally suppress messages that are very near to the value predicted by the regression model.”
- Approximate aggregation techniques for sensor databases (2004, methodology): “However, similar approaches are used to compute aggregates in other systems [20, 21, 23, 13].”
- Tributaries and deltas: efficient and robust aggregation in sensor network streams (2005, methodology): “Through extensive simulation with real-world and synthetic data, we show the signi.cant advantages of our techniques.”
- Infrastructure for Data Processing in Large-Scale Interconnected Sensor Networks (2007, background): “Similarly, in Cougar [13] (http://www.cs.cornell.edu/database/cougar/) an extended version of SQL is used, modeling temporal characteristics in the language itself.”
- Clock synchronization for wireless sensor networks: a survey (2005, background): “In wireless sensor networks, the basic operation is data fusion , whereby data from each sensor is agglomerated to form a single meaningful result [17,44,71,74,76–78].”
- An Energy-Efficient Data Collection Framework for Wireless Sensor Networks by Exploiting Spatiotemporal Correlation (2007, methodology): “To exploit the spatial correlation, we partition the sensor nodes with similar observations into a cluster.”
- Exploiting Virtual Coordinates for Improved Routing Performance in Sensor Networks (2011, methodology): “Combined with database technology such as data stream query processing, further optimization can be achieved [15].”
- Issues in data stream management (2003, background): “characteristics (when transmitting and receiving) are known [51, 70].”
- Online outlier detection in sensor data using non-parametric models (2006, background): “Yao and Gehrke [45] investigate the problem of query processing in sensor networks.”
- Model-based approximate querying in sensor networks (2005, methodology): “We note that this approach to routing is substantially different than approaches used in other sensor network databases (e.g., Cougar [56] and TinyDB [40]) that use (scoped) flooding approaches to disseminate queries throughout a network.”
- Model-Driven Data Acquisition in Sensor Networks (2004, background): “However , the leading approaches to query processing in sensornets [30] [21] follow a completist's approach, acquiring as much data as possible from the environment at a given point in time, even when most of that data provides little benefit in approximate answer quality.”