Small Neutrino Masses from Supersymmetry Breaking
By N. Arkani-Hamed, Lawrence J. Hall, Hitoshi Murayama, David Smith, N. Weiner. 2000
733 citations recorded by the source corpus.
An alternative to the conventional see-saw mechanism is proposed to explain the origin of small neutrino masses in supersymmetric theories. The masses and couplings of the right-handed neutrino field are suppressed by supersymmetry breaking, in a way similar to the suppression of the Higgs doublet mass, $\mu$. New mechanisms for light Majorana, Dirac and sterile neutrinos arise, depending on the degree of suppression. Superpartner phenomenology is greatly altered by the presence of weak scale right-handed sneutrinos, which may have a coupling to a Higgs boson and a left-handed sneutrino. The sneutrino spectrum and couplings are quite unlike the conventional case - the lightest sneutrino can be the dark matter and predictions are given for event rates at upcoming halo dark matter direct detection experiments. Higgs decays and search strategies are changed. Copious Higgs production at hadron colliders can result from cascade decays of squarks and gluinos.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46d5e8c4e40c5e8f53210cdd23e6a6329ab664a2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- L. Strigari
- M. Lisanti
- Michael Kuhlen
- P. Madau
- Jonathan L. Feng
- Atlas Collaboration
- J. Diemand
- R. Essig
Citations in the corpus
- Minimal model for dark matter and unification (2005, background): “This is is necessary in order to avoid the limit from spin-independent direct detection measurements [12].”
- Migdal effect in dark matter direct detection experiments (2017, background): “(23)The annual modulation caused by the Earth’s peculiar motion can be significantly enhanced as of the inelastic nuclear scattering [49].”
- Colloquium: Annual modulation of dark matter (2013, background): “(3) is that the particle physics and astrophysics separate into two 1Inelastic scattering with ’ Oð100 keVÞ was first invoked to reconcile the DAMA anomaly with the CDMS limits (Tucker-Smith and Weiner, 2001).”
- Probing dark forces and light hidden sectors at low-energy e+e- colliders (2009, background): “zation of Couplings Inelastic dark matter offers a simple explanation that reconciles the annual modulation signal reported by DAMA/LIBRA with the null results of other experiments, and is reviewed in [12, 13]. Below, we summarize our procedure for normalizing αDǫ2 assuming that DAMA/LIBRA is explain”
- Numerical simulations of the dark universe: State of the art and the next decade (2012, background): “On the other hand, with inelastic DM [157], for which the relation between ER and vmin can become inverted, or light DM [158] (mDM .”
- Dark matter, millicharges, axion and scalar particles, gauge bosons, and other new physics with LDMX (2018, background): “Since DM couples purely off-diagonally to the dark photon in these scenarios, scattering processes (such as χ1f → χ2f ) at direct detection experiments are kinematically suppressed if the χ1,2 fractional mass-splitting is larger thanO(10−6) [100].”
- Abelian hidden sectors at a GeV (2009, background): “This requires an inelastic mass splitting on the order of 100 keV and an effective nucleon scattering cross-section in the range σn ∼ ( 10−40 − 10−38 ) cm2, assuming a single dominant dark matter component [12, 32–35, 81].”
- Expression of interest for the CODEX-b detector (2019, background): “Berlin and Kling [119] have studied the reach for various (proposed) LLP experiments in the context of a simple model for inelastic dark matter [120, 121].”