A bioeconomic model of marine sanctuaries on Georges Bank

By D. Holland. 2000

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46cbd5a6697924b2c1489a5f48239e8f2c85b1e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Natalie Ban
2. Peter J. S. Jones
3. Olivier Thébaud
4. C. Klein
5. Luc Doyen
6. L. Botsford
7. Vincent Martinet
8. J. Sanchirico

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Peter J. S. Jones
2. Olivier Thébaud
3. C. Klein
4. Luc Doyen
5. Vincent Martinet
6. Natalie Ban
7. J. Sanchirico

Citations in the corpus

• Connectivity, sustainability, and yield: bridging the gap between conventional fisheries management and marine protected areas (2009, background): “For example, Holland (2000) found that closures on Georges Bank would lead to increased equilibrium SSB for many species on Georges Bank, but could result in decreased SSB for stocks in adjacent areas (Gulf of Maine and Southern New England) due to increased fishing effort in those areas.”
• Defining viable recovery path toward sustainable fisheries (2007, methodology): “…for the simulation of specific adjustment trajectories for given bioeconomic systems, according to predetermined scenarii, and on their a posteriori evaluation with respect to a given set of criteria, e.g. economic, social and/or biological (Smith, 1969; Holland, 2000; Mardle and Pascoe, 2002).”
• Marine Protected Areas: Economic and Social Implications (2002, background): “Equity issues among the stakeholders in the process can easily arise because MPAs will most likely affect user groups disproportionately (Holland 2000).”
• Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground (2004, background): “A number of modeling exercises which indicate that FMRs may yield such benefits have been reported (e.g., Guénette et al., 1998; Holland, 2000; Sumaila et al., 2000; NRC, 2001), particularly for populations with sedentary adults, (e.g., Hannesson, 1998; Hastings and Botsford, 1999; Nowlis and…”
• Models and indicators for assessing conservation and fisheries-related effects of marine protected areas (2008, unknown): “Fourth, spatially-explicit fisheries models include additional detail concerning exploitation, in particular effort may be described in terms of gears, vessel number and characteristics, and fleet dynamics (Walters and Bonfil 1999 ; Holland 2000; Pelletier and Mahévas 2005).”
• Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning (2009, background): “In particular, spatially explicit bioeconomic modeling of fisheries can assess the potential cost or benefit of protected areas to one or more fisheries (Holland 2000; Smith & Wilen 2003).”