Voluntary Incentive Design for Endangered Species Protection

By Rodney B.W. Smith, Jason F. Shogren. 2002

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Agglomeration bonus: an incentive mechanism to reunite fragmented habitat for biodiversity conservation (2002, background): “Smith and Shogren (2001, 2002) proposed such an incentive mechanism— the agglomeration bonus designed to create the contiguous habitat across fence lines.”
Conservation of Endangered Species: Can Incentives Work for Private Landowners? (2006, background): “There is also a growing literature that specifically addresses the use of incentives to promote management that benefits endangered species (see, e.g., Smith and Shogren 2001, 2002, Defenders of Wildlife 1994, Stone 1995, Kennedy et al. 1996, Bourland and Stroup 1996).”
The efficiency of voluntary incentive policies for preventing biodiversity loss (2009, background): “Lewis and Plantinga (2007) combine an econometric model of landowner decisions with GIS-based landscape simulations to examine the ability of simple incentive policies to reduce habitat fragmentation in South Carolina.”
Spatially Uniform versus Spatially Heterogeneous Compensation Payments for Biodiversity-Enhancing Land-Use Measures (2005, background): “These may differ among land-users and influence the minimum amount of compensation land-users demand for carrying out biodiversity-enhancing land-use measures ( Smith and Shogren 2002 ).”