Unpacking the 'Joint' in Joint Forest Management

By N. Sundar. 2000

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46924502be7a656db2f881eec521a7c1fc177084

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Madagascar aflame: landscape burning as peasant protest, resistance, or a resource management tool? (2002, background): “Field agents of the state must answer both to villagers as neighbors as well as to their superiors, and they often have their own interests in mind (Neumann 1998; Sundar 2000).”
Capturing the Value of Forest Carbon for Local Livelihoods (2003, background): “This has occurred in a number of cases in India’s JFM program (Saxena, 1997; Sundar, 2000).”
Engaging Simplifications: Community-Based Resource Management, Market Processes and State Agendas in Upland Southeast Asia (2002, background): “…arising as a pre-formed center moves outwards to colonize and incorporate pre-formed communities on the peripheries, the historical record suggests that state formation and community formation have proceeded simultaneously as part of a single process (Agrawal, 2001; Li, 1999b; Sundar, 2000:257).”
Evaluating Forest Management in Nepal: Views across Space and Time (2005, background): “Managing institutional change from the top down is not an easy task, and communities require the flexibility to incorporate context-specific learning into their management activities (Poffenberger and McGean 1996, Sundar 2000, Prasad and Kant 2003).”
Collective Action, Property Rights, and Decentralization in Resource Use in India and Nepal (2001, unknown): “But where more significant issues are at stake as transfer of power to villagers, formation of forest protection committees, share in timber sales, or ability to negotiate rule changes, villagers are highly constrained in their ability to act (Kumar 2000, Sundar 2000).”