Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation.

By M. Baguette, S. Petit, François Quéva. 2000

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/468bf3b2da9f3c7b4fd77a89928429dac10469f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, background): “Two Belgian studies are of interest here: Baguette et al. (2000) reported butterflies using open areas within forests as corridors for some chalk grassland species and Vandewoestijne et al. (2004) demonstrated that gene flow of Melanargia galathea was twice as fast between colonies linked by linear…”
Habitat models and habitat connectivity analysis for butterflies and burnet moths - The example of Zygaena carniolica and Coenonympha arcania (2005, background): “This is confirmed by Krauss et al. (2004) for Cupido minimus: while isolation did not play an important role for patch occupancy in landscapes with general high habitat quality, distribution was clearly more scattered in sub-optimal landscapes (see also Baguette et al., 2000; Binzenhöfer, 2005).”
Landscape occupancy and local population size depends on host plant distribution in the butterfly Cupido minimus (2004, unknown): “minimus remained in the patch where they had been marked, and maximum flight distance recorded was 762 m (Baguette et al., 2000).”
Local population dynamics are important to the conservation of metapopulations in highly fragmented landscapes (2003, background): “Knowledge of the importance of dispersal for species persistence at the landscape scale has focused the attention of conservationists on the spatial configuration of habitat patches in the landscape, directing efforts towards the increase of structural and functional connectivity in habitat networks”
Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape (2003, result): “These results are similar to those observed in other butterfly species (Hesperia comma, Hill et al. 1996; Melanargia galathea, Baguette et al. 2000; Lopinga achine females, Bergman and Landin 2001).”
Do corridors promote dispersal in grassland butterflies and other insects? (2007, background): “Patch area has frequently been reported to affect migration rates (Kuussaari et al. 1996; Sutcliffe et al. 1997; Baguette et al. 2000; Wahlberg et al. 2002).”
The influence of spatial scale on quantifying insect dispersal: an analysis of butterfly data (2003, background): “It is known that mark–release– recapture studies underestimate dispersal (Shreeve, 1992), but it was first with the results of large-scale studies that this became more obvious (overview by Hanski & Kuussaari, 1995; Brunzel & Reich, 1996; Nève et al., 1996; Mousson et al., 1999; Baguette et al., 200”
Insect communities and biotic interactions on fragmented calcareous grasslands - a mini review (2002, background): “Further studies showed that emigration rates of Aphantopus hyperantus (Sutcliffe et al., 1997), Melanargia galathea and Aporia crataegi (Baguette et al., 2000) declined with increasing patch area, while the fraction of the resident populations increased.”
Dispersal characteristics and management of a rare damselfly (2003, background): “Thus, it is expected that for C. mercuriale, as with many species of butterflies (Thomas & Hanski 1997; Baguette, Petit & Queva 2000 ), isolation will negatively affect patch occupancy (with regards to both colonization of empty habitat and population persistence).”
Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics (2005, background): “Field studies support this expectation (e.g. butterflies : Hill et al., 1996; Kuussaari et al., 1996; Baguette et al., 2000; Roland et al., 2000; birds : Serrano & Tella, 2003) though studies have yet to reveal the exact relationship between dispersal distance and costs of dispersal.”
Diversity patterns of wild bees and wasps in managed boreal forests: Effects of spatial structure, local habitat and surrounding landscape (2015, background): “2012), while species-specific dispersal (Baguette et al. 2000), habitat amount and configuration are important on a landscape scale (Holzschuh et al.”
Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area (2003, background): “So far, patch area, patch isolation, patch quality, and sex have been identified as factors influencing butterfly dispersal in landscapes with fragmented habitats (Dover et al., 1992; Hanski, 1994; Hill et al., 1996; Kuussaari et al., 1996; Baguette et al., 1998, 2000; Petit et al., 2001).”