Using Social Cognitive Career Theory to Understand Head Coaching Intentions among Assistant Coaches of Women’s Teams
By George B. Cunningham, A. Doherty, Melanie J. Gregg. 2007
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/468330c794a819d4a45fa62400244d60fd59510e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Gender Studies
Citations in the corpus
- Gender and Sex Diversity in Sport Organizations: Introduction to a Special Issue (2008, background): “In seeking to understand why such differences exist, researchers have pointed to differences between men and women in self-efficacy (Cunningham et al. 2007; Cunningham et al. 2003), the anticipated outcomes associated with being a head coach ( Cunningham et al. 2007 ), support from administrators (D”
- The Under Representation of Women in the Male Dominated Sport Workplace: Perspectives of Female Coaches (2010, background): “…such as oversexualization and marginalization (Duncan, 1990), discrepancies in coaching intentions between men and women (Cunningham et al., 2003; Cunningham et al., 2007; Sagas, Cunningham, & Teed, 2006), and hiring biases explained by homologous reproduction (Kanter, 1977; Lovett & Lowry,…”
- Barriers and supports for female coaches: an ecological model (2012, unknown): “Relatedly, some females perceived fewer positive outcomes would accrue when moving from assistant to head coach (Cunningham, Doherty, & Gregg, 2007 ; Cunningham, Sagas, & Ashley, 2003 ; Sagas, Cunningham, & Pastore, 2006 ; Sagas, Paetzold, & Ashley, 2005 ).”