Multiple resources and performance prediction

By C. Wickens. 2002

2,642 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/467948fa466e8e1c332356abb70a28e8afda8290

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers (2013, background): “This is especially true if both tasks are competing for resources within the same sensory modality (Navon & Gopher, 1979; Wickens, 2002; Wickens & Hollands, 2000).”
Regulating Conversation During Driving: A Problem for Mobile Telephones? (2005, background): “Wickens, 2002 ), proposes four dimensions on which tasks mayoverlap and therefore draw on the same limited pool of attentional resources.”
The Effects of Text Messaging on Young Drivers (2009, background): “…in degradation of driving performance depends on several factors, including the demands of the driving task, the demands of the secondary task, and the manner in which resources are allocated between the two tasks (e.g., Horrey & Wickens, 2004; Lee, Regan, & Young, 2008; Wickens, 2002, 2008).”
What is Shared in Joint Action? Issues of Co-representation, Response Conflict, and Agent Identification (2011, background): “…is that participants only co-represent their co-actor's S-R mappings when they perform single response go/nogo tasks together, but do not corepresent their partners' more complicated task shares on joint binary choice go/ nogo tasks because of limited cognitive resources (e.g., Wickens 2002).”
Break It Down: A Comparison of Macro- and Microtasks (2015, background): “There is evidence that information workers already implicitly break larger tasks down: people perceive tasks in segments [13], and mental workload dips at task boundaries, rising during individual subtasks [12].”
Driver workload and eye blink duration (2011, methodology): “The SuRT (like most commercial IVIS) requires visual perception and manual response: such activities, according to Wickens’ multiple resources model (Wickens, 2002), require the same mental resources of the driving task and will therefore be more likely to interfere, possibly causing a performance d”
Driver distraction: A review of the literature (2003, positive): “According to Wickens’ multiple resource theory, if two tasks, performed concurrently, compete for similar cognitive, perceptual or motor resources then dual-task interference occurs (Wickens, 2002).”
Multimodal Interfaces: A Survey of Principles, Models and Frameworks (2009, background): “Wickens [72][73] also developed a framework, the “multiple resource model”, aimed at performance prediction involving coordination between user input and system output modes for different types of tasks.”
Driver performance effects of simultaneous visual and cognitive distraction and adaptation behavior (2012, background): “Multiple resource theory (MRT) suggests that secondary tasks that compete for the same resources required by driving could degrade driver performance (Wickens, 2002).”
Human-centered design meets cognitive load theory: designing interfaces that help people think (2006, background): “designing interfaces that effectively minimize cognitive load [5, 6, 17, 26, 31, 33-37].”
Ergonomics Society of the Human Factors and Human Factors: The Journal (2014, positive): “Multiple resource theory of attention (Wickens, 2002) provides a basis for characterizing the driving task from a cognitive perspective.”
Estimating cognitive load using remote eye tracking in a driving simulator (2010, background): “Cognitive load (also referred to as mental workload) is commonly defined as the relationship between the cognitive demands placed on a user by a task and the user's cognitive resources [Wickens 2002].”