Entice: Endogenous Technological Change in the Dice Model of Global Warming

By David Popp. 2004

598 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/465a434f44f5fafa110650c614cc11ab299574d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Climate Policy and Innovation: A Quantitative Macroeconomic Analysis (2018, background): “Both Popp (2002) and Aghion et al. (2015) estimate a dynamic specification which make it possible to compute the five year elasticity. See Table 4 in Popp (2002) and Table 10 Appendix C in Aghion et al.”
What Should We Expect from Innovation? A Model-Based Assessment of the Environmental and Mitigation Cost Implications of Climate-Related R&D (2010, background): “Popp (2006) has shown that combining carbon pricing and R&D policies can yield welfare gains, but that these are modest with respect to the optimal carbon tax case.”
The Impacts of Unilateral Climate Policy on Competitiveness: Evidence From Computable General Equilibrium Models (2017, background): “Some progress has been made in incorporating this feature into single-sector macro growth models of climate policy (Popp 2004).”
Where does energy R&D come from? Examining crowding out from energy R&D (2012, background): “Popp (2004) shows that assumptions about the magnitude of such crowding out explain much of the variation in results across IA models with induced technological change.”
The Optimal Climate Policy Portfolio When Knowledge Spills Across Sectors (2010, unknown): “…Massetti and Nicita (2009) widely discussed this result and argued against the exogenous crowding-out hypothesis imposed in Nordhaus (2002) and Popp (2004, 2006) on the grounds that, at least in the medium/long term, societies are free to allocate the optimal amount of resources to knowledge…”
Technical change and the marginal cost of abatement (2008, background): “inputs. In Popp [ 37 ][38] knowledge substitutes for overall energy; in Goulder and Schneider [22] and Sue”
From financial instability to green finance: the role of banking and credit market regulation in the Eurace model (2019, background): “…building on pioneering work on the interaction between endogenous innovation and environmental policies, see e.g. van der Zwaan et al. (2002); Popp (2004), introduce a comprehensive growth model with environmental constraints characterized by endogenous and directed technical change, showing…”
The Transition to Endogenous Technical Change in Climate-Economy Models: A Technical Overview to the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project (2006, background): “Popp (2004) argues assumptions about the magnitude of ue. Popp (2004) argues assumptions about the magnitude of argues assumptions about the magnitude of crowding out have significant effects on the potential welfare gains from ITC.”
Uncertain R&D, backstop technology and GHGs stabilization (2007, unknown): “Such a formulation has received empirical support for energy innovation by Popp (2004).”
Path dependence, innovation and the economics of climate change (2014, background): “A number of climate economic models have attempted to incorporate innovation (see, for example, Popp (2004) and Bosetti et al. (2006), as well as a summary by Gillingham et al. (2008).”
The Role of R&D and Technology Diffusion in Climate Change Mitigation: New Perspectives Using the Witch Model (2009, unknown): “Following Popp (Popp, 2004), technological advances are captured by a stock of knowledge combined with energy in a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) function, thus stimulating energy efficiency improvements:”
Energy efficiency, rebound effects and the environmental Kuznets Curve (2011, methodology): “Popp (2004) incorporates an endogenous technological change into the DICE model of climate change to compare the welfare costs of carbon policy against models that treat technological change as exogenous.”
Climate policy modeling: An online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review (2015, background): “Global DICE [46] ENTICE [84] MIND [73] GET-LFL [92] JAM [134] IGEM [135]”