What Should We Expect from Innovation? A Model-Based Assessment of the Environmental and Mitigation Cost Implications of Climate-Related R&D
By Valentina Bosetti, Carlo Carraro, R. Duval, Massimo Tavoni. Social Science Research Network, 2010
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper addresses two basic issues related to technological innovation and climate stabilisation objectives: i) Can innovation policies be effective in stabilising greenhouse gas concentrations? ii) To what extent can innovation policies complement carbon pricing (taxes or permit trading) and improve the economic efficiency of a mitigation policy package? To answer these questions, we use an integrated assessment model with multiple externalities and an endogenous representation of technical progress in the energy sector. We evaluate a range of innovation policies, both as a stand-alone instrument and in combination with other mitigation policies. Even under fairly optimistic assumptions about the funding available for, and the returns to R&D, our analysis indicates that innovation policies alone are unlikely to stabilise global concentration and temperature. The efficiency gains of combining innovation and carbon pricing policies are found to reach about 10% for a stabilisation target of 535 ppm CO2eq. However, such gains are reduced when more plausible (sub-optimal) global innovation policy arrangements are considered.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a04519dc0fb6fe1d1e0f77b98833437bdd0a543a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Sonia Yeh
- Inês Lima Azevedo
- Richard S. J. Tol
- P. Jaramillo
- Edward S. Rubin
- David Anthoff
- Gary W. Yohe
- Francesco Bosello
Citations in the corpus
- Targets for global climate policy: an overview (2013, background): “Calibrated models show that learning-by-doing does not have much effect on the optimal emission reduction trajectory (Bosetti et al., 2006; Gerlagh and van der Zwaan, 2003).”
- A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies (2015, methodology): “…policy analysis, including the MESSAGE-MACRO model (McDonald and Schrattenholzer, 2001), the ReMIND-R model (Luderer et al., 2010), the WITCH model (Bosetti et al., 2009, 2011), the NEMS model (Gabriel et al., 2001), the EPA-MARKAL model (Shay et al., 2006), the REGEN model (EPRI, 2013b), and the…”