Terrorism and the world economy

By Alberto Abadie, Javier Gardeazabal. Transnational Terrorism, 2005

393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

It has been argued that terrorism should not have a large e®ect on economic activity, because terrorist attacks destroy only a small fraction of the stock of capital of a country (see, e.g., Becker and Murphy, 2001). In contrast, empirical estimates of the consequences of terrorism typically suggest large e®ects on economic outcomes (see, e.g., Abadie and Gardeazabal, 2003). The main theme of this article is that mobility of productive capital in an open economy may account for much of the di®erence between the direct and the equilibrium impact of terrorism. We use a simple economic model to show that terrorism may have a large impact on the allocation of productive capital across countries, even if it represents a small fraction of the overall economic risk. The model emphasizes that, in addition to increasing uncertainty, terrorism reduces the expected return to investment. As a result, changes in the intensity of terrorism may cause large movements of capital across countries if the world economy is su±ciently open, so international investors are able to diversify other types of country risks. Using a unique dataset on terrorism and other country risks, we ¯nd that, in accordance with the predictions of the model, higher levels of terrorist risks are associated with lower levels of net foreign direct investment positions, even after controlling for other types of country risks. A standard deviation increase in the terrorist risk induces a fall in the net foreign direct investment position of about 5 percent of GDP. The magnitude of the estimated e®ect is large, which suggests that the \open-economy channel" impact of terrorism may be substantial.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/462eb3e9c682e73bb59d328dfba509bbc94ae2aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Rangan Gupta
  2. Chang Hoon Oh
  3. Jennifer M. Oetzel
  4. Clement Kyei
  5. N. Apergis
  6. Matteo Bonato
  7. Łukasz Goczek
  8. A. Cieślik

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Chang Hoon Oh
  2. Jennifer M. Oetzel
  3. Rangan Gupta
  4. Matteo Bonato
  5. N. Apergis

Citations in the corpus