A Proximal Gradient Algorithm for Decentralized Composite Optimization
By Wei Shi, Qing Ling, Gang Wu, Wotao Yin. 2015
318 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computer Networks and Communications, Optimization & Training, Mathematical Optimization
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Optimization & Training
In Mathematical Optimization
Citations in the corpus
- GADMM: Fast and Communication Efficient Framework for Distributed Machine Learning (2019, methodology): “…there are a variety of distributed optimization algorithms proposed in the literature, such as primal methods (Jakoveti´c et al., 2014; Nedi´c and Olshevsky, 2014; Nedi´c and Ozdaglar, 2009; Shi et al., 2015) and primal-dual methods (Chang et al., 2014a; Koppel et al., 2017; Bedi et al., 2019).”
- Robust and Communication-Efficient Collaborative Learning (2019, methodology): “…descent-type methods (Nedic and Ozdaglar, 2009; Jakovetic et al., 2014; Yuan et al., 2016; Qu and Li, 2017), augmented Lagrangian algorithms (Shi et al., 2015a,b; Mokhtari and Ribeiro, 2016), distributed variants of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) (Schizas et al.,…”
- D2: Decentralized Training over Decentralized Data (2018, background): “Existing decentralized consensus algorithms [Li et al., 2017, Shi et al., 2015b] use a modification of the doubly stochastic matrix such that λ > 0, i.e., choose W = ( ˜ W + I ) /2 where W is a doubly stochastic matrix.”
- Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent (2017, methodology): “This issue was fixed later by Shi et al. [2015a], Wu et al. [2016] by using the gradients of last two instead of one iterates in each iteration, which was later improved in Li et al. [2017], Shi et al. [2015b] by considering proximal gradients.”
- Communication Compression for Decentralized Training (2018, methodology): “Two methods [Li et al., 2017, Shi et al., 2015] were proposed to blackuce the steady point error in decentralized gradient descent convex optimization.”
- Towards More Efficient Stochastic Decentralized Learning: Faster Convergence and Sparse Communication (2018, methodology): “EXTRA (Shi et al., 2015a) improves over DGD by incorporating information from the last two iterates and is shown to converge linearly.”
- Walkman: A Communication-Efficient Random-Walk Algorithm for Decentralized Optimization (2018, methodology): “This approach includes well-known algorithms such as diffusion [5], [6] and consensus [11], [12], distributed ADMM (D-ADMM) [13]–[15], EXTRA [16], PG-EXTRA [17], DIGing [18], exact diffusion [19], NIDS [20], and beyond.”
- A geometrically convergent method for distributed optimization over time-varying graphs (2016, background): “…that work over undirected fixed graphs and usually need a diminishing step size to reach exact convergence; references [16]–[21], [23], [24], [27] concern about primal-dual-like methods which can deploy constant step size and converge quickly and exactly to the solution over undirected…”
- Distributed Linearized Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for Composite Convex Consensus Optimization (2015, methodology): “In [21], the proximal gradient exact first-order algorithm (PG-EXTRA) is proposed; PG-EXTRA is an extension of the algorithm EXTRA [23] to handle the non-smooth terms { ξ i } i ∈N .”
- Push–Pull Gradient Methods for Distributed Optimization in Networks (2018, background): “Work in [28], [29] investigates proximal-gradient methods which can tackle (1) with proximal friendly component functions.”
- Asynchronous Decentralized Online Learning (2021, background): “Learner i t receives a convex function f t from environment, and suffers the loss f t ( w i t ( t )) .”
- Q-GADMM: Quantized Group ADMM for Communication Efficient Decentralized Machine Learning (2019, unknown): “In the distributed optimization literature, there are a variety of algorithms that are broadly categorized into primal meth-ods [27]–[30] and primal-dual methods [31]–[33].”
- Decentralization Meets Quantization (2018, methodology): “Two methods [Li et al., 2017, Shi et al., 2015] were proposed to blackuce the steady point error in decentralized gradient descent convex optimization.”
- A primal-dual algorithm with optimal stepsizes and its application in decentralized consensus optimization (2017, methodology): “We will show in Section 3 that the famous decentralized algorithm– Proximal Gradient EXact firsT-ordeR Algorithm (PG-EXTRA) [19] is exactly the primal-dual algorithm in (7), which is a generalization of (4) for solving (1).”
- Decentralized consensus optimization with asynchrony and delays (2016, methodology): “To establish convergence under delays, we cannot follow the existing analysis of PG-EXTRA [2]; instead, motivated by [30], [32], a new non-Euclidean metric is introduced to absorb the delays.”
- A Decentralized Proximal-Gradient Method With Network Independent Step-Sizes and Separated Convergence Rates (2017, methodology): “By making a simple modification over PG-EXTRA [1], our proposed algorithm brings a big improvement in the speed and the dependency of convergence over networks.”