The Heterogeneous Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Debunking the Stereotype of the Lazy Welfare Recipient (2015, unknown): “Sources: Honduras: Galiani and McEwan (2013), Glewwe and Olinto (2004); Morocco: Benhassine et al. (2015); Mexico Progresa: Parker and Skoufias (2000); Skoufias and di Maro (2008); Mexico PAL: Skoufias and Gonz alez-Coss ıo (2008), Skoufias, Unar, and Gonzalez-Cossio (2013); Philipinnes: Chaudhury, ”
Educational Impacts and Cost-Effectiveness of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in Developing Countries: A Meta-Analysis (2017, unknown): “…al., 2009), Honduras’ PRAF II program offered payments to parent–teacher associations in primary schools where a quality improvement plan was required (Galiani & McEwan, 2013), and Nicaragua’s Red de Protección Social program offered a supply cash transfer (bono a la oferta) distributed between…”
Improving Learning in Primary Schools of Developing Countries (2015, background): “In Honduras, for example, one of the earliest studies of CCTs developed a factorial design to separately evaluate block grants to schools, CCTs, and the combination of the two (Galiani & McEwan, 2013).”
Improving Education in Developing Countries (2016, background): “…on the enrollment of students transitioning between levels of schooling (e.g., from primary to lower secondary school; Schultz, 2004), children of age to be in grades with especially low enrollment rates (Maluccio & Flores, 2005), and students from the poorest families (Galiani & McEwan, 2013).”