The interaction of tone and stress in Optimality Theory
By Paul de Lacy. Phonology, 2002
213 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45654ddd65fc05857048969c8b57ca7b373c84ca
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Issues in loanword adaptation: A case study from Thai (2006, background): “Stressed syllables and F0 peaks have a natural affinity both in loanword adaptation (Kenstowicz 2004) and of course in synchronic phonology (see de Lacy (2002) as well as Li (2003) for recent discussion, the latter based on examples from several Asian languages).”
- DRAFTTo be submitted to Language Sciences How (not) to do Phonological Typology: The Case of Pitch-Accent (2009, background): “(The second concerns cases where stress is allegedly assigned based on the tonal composition of a word, something to which de Lacy 2002 has brought recent attention.)”
- Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology (2006, background): “(45) Head-sonority conflation typology GUjarati (this section, de Lacy 2002a:ch.3) Pichis Asheninca (J.Payne 1990) Yil (Martens & Tuominen 1977) Nganasan (de Lacy 2004) Kara (Schlie & Schlie 1993; de Lacy 1997) All vowels are treated the same Table (45) also shows that almost every imaginable…”
- Tone: Is it Different? (2007, background): “Numerous formal proposals have been made concerning tone features and feature geometry, register effects such as downstep, and the interaction between tone and stress (de Lacy 2002), among other issues.”
- A directional asymmetry in Chinese tone sandhi systems (2007, background): “…that predicts the inserted default tone to be exactly 22 beyond noting that the typological literature on tone has a tentative agreement that level tones are less marked than contour tones (Zhang (2002)) and low tones are less marked than high tones (Jiang-King (1996, 1999), de Lacy (2002)).”