DRAFTTo be submitted to Language Sciences How (not) to do Phonological Typology: The Case of Pitch-Accent
By Larry M. Hyman. 2009
263 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e5df259349380b5456d34237db5d36ff0b001a0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Canonical derivational morphology (2010, methodology): “In canonical typology, inflectional morphology has been treated by Baerman, Brown & Corbett (2005: 27-35), Spencer (2005), Stump (2005b) (2006), Corbett (2007a, 2007b, -3 - 2009), Nikolaeva & Spencer (2008), Stump & Finkel (2008) and Thornton (2008), and phonology by Hyman (2009).”
- Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits (2015, background): “…in Corbett 1999, 2007a, 2009, Baerman et al. 2005:27–35, Stump 2006, 2007, 2013, Spencer 2007, Thornton 2011a, Paciaroni 2012, and Palancar 2012.6 For a canonical approach to phonology, specifically to tone, see Hyman 2009, 2011, and for derivational morphology and semantics see Fortin 2011.”
- What is Phonological Typology (2014, background): “The other view, which I have termed property-driven typology (Hyman 2009: 213, 2012: 371), is that typology is not about the classification of languages but rather the characterization of linguistic properties: “Typology, thus, is not so much about the classification of languages as about the…”