Efficiency, Ownership and Market Structure, Corporate Control and Governance in the Turkish Banking Industry

By Ihsan Berk Isik, M. K. Hassan. 2003

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4555a526ffe3203ece3984b8a75599d6658e0c49

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Finance

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Profitability of the Korean Banking Sector: Panel Evidence on Bank-Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants (2011, methodology): “(2002) and Kosmidou (2008). Hauner (2005) offers two potential explanations for which size could have a positive impact on bank performance.”
Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey (2010, unknown): “Chen (1998) in Taiwan, and Mercan et al. (2003) in Turkey also report that the efficiency of privately-owned banks is higher than that of state-owned banks.”
Cost and profit efficiency of conventional and Islamic banks in GCC countries (2010, background): “In addition, some studies ( Isik and Hassan 2003 ) which find that high capital requirements increase the efficiency of banks are in favour of the theory of moral hazard.”
The determinants of Islamic banks' efficiency changes: Empirical evidence from the MENA and Asian banking sectors (2009, methodology): “Following Havrylchyk (2006), Sathye (2001), and Isik and Hassan (2003), the ratio of loan loss provisions to total loans (LLP/TL) is incorporated as an independent variable in the regression analysis as a proxy of risk.”
Determinants of Bank Profitability in Ukraine (2011, background): “The study of UK banks by Kosmidou et al. (2004) suggests that domestic banks outperform foreign ones. Also, Hasan & Lozano-Vivas (1998) find no substantial difference in profits of domestic and foreign banks. In the emerging markets results usually differ leaning in favor of banks with foreign owner”
The impact of non-traditional activities on the estimation of bank efficiency: International evidence (2010, background): “Siems and Clark (1997), Rogers (1998) and more recently Isik and Hassan (2003) among others, imply that models that ignore such non-traditional outputs may penalize banks that are heavily involved in such activities.”
Determinants of bank profitability in a developing economy: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh (2009, result): “The result is consistent with previous studies (Isik and Hassan 2003; Staikouras and Wood 2003: Goddard et al. 2004; Pasiouras and Kosmidou 2007; Kosmidou 2008) providing support to the argument that well capitalized banks face lower costs of going bankrupt, thus lower their cost of funding, or…”
Efficiency of conventional versus Islamic banks: evidence from the Middle East (2009, background): “For example: Malaysia (Sufian and Ibrahim, 2005), Pakistan (Limi, 2004), Bangladesh (Sarker, 1999), Turkey (Isik and Hassan, 2002a, b), Jordan (Isik and Hassan, 2003), Bahrain (Hassan et al.”
The Effect of Board Size and Composition on the Efficiency of UK Banks (2011, background): “…sections that follow, we briefly discuss: (i) some theoretical considerations highlighting the influence of the board of directors based on agency and other theories; (ii) some pertinent issues relating to bank governance due to regulations; and (iii) empirical evidence from the banking industry.”
Bank efficiency and non-performing loans: Evidence from Turkey (2019, methodology): “Our paper reveals that 7 Following Isik and Hassan (2002 and 2003) we categorized banks size according to their total amount of assets.”
Estimating the technical and scale efficiency of Greek commercial banks: The impact of credit risk, off-balance sheet activities, and international operations (2008, background): “LOANS carries a positive sign that is statistically significant in all cases and is consistent with Isik and Hassan (2003a).”
Does economic freedom fosters banks’ performance? Panel evidence from Malaysia (2010, result): “The result is consistent with previous studies (Isik and Hassan, 2003; Staikouras and Wood, 2003; Goddard et al., 2004; Pasiouras and Kosmidou, 2007; Kosmidou, 2008) providing support to the argument that well capitalized banks face lower costs of going bankrupt, thus lowers their funding cost, or…”
International evidence on the impact of regulations and supervision on banks’ technical efficiency: an application of two-stage data envelopment analysis (2007, unknown): “ Isik and Hassan 2003 ) that there is no consensus in the banking literature on the preferred approach for estimating efficiency.”