Service profiling and Outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies : Patient-Focused Research

By M. Barkham, C. Leach, M. Lucock, F. Margison, J. Mellor-Clark, Liz Benson, J. Connell, K. Audin, C. Evans, G. McGrath. 2001

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/453dec9f654ebee822097f7a7542169f6c3c7044

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. Vogel
2. N. Wade
3. Bridgette M. Bewick
4. Jeremy Miles
5. Gina Z. Koutsopoulou
6. E. Slaa
7. David M. Clark
8. M. Barkham

In Sociology and Political Science

1. D. Vogel
2. Peter Ji
3. J. Valentine
4. A. Biglan
5. N. Wade
6. D. Gottfredson

Citations in the corpus

• Changes in undergraduate students’ psychological well‐being as they progress through university (2010, methodology): “All surveys included the General Population Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (GP-CORE; Sinclair et al. 2005), a general population version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM; Barkham et al. 2001, 2005; Evans et al. 2002).”
• Standards of Evidence: Criteria for Efficacy, Effectiveness and Dissemination (2005, background): “…Guide for Community Preventive Services (Benedict et al., 2000), SAMHSA’s National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP) program (Barkham et al., 2001), the U.S. Department of Education’s (1998) Safe and Drug Free Schools program and the Institute of Education Science’s…”
• Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: The IAPT experience (2011, methodology): “As well as the new session-by-session outcome monitoring scheme, the sites also obtained outcome data on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (Barkham et al., 2001) using a more conventional pre and post-treatment only data collection protocol.”
• Measuring Perceptions of Stigmatization by Others for Seeking Psychological Help: Reliability and Validity of a New Stigma Scale With College Students (2009, background): “Internal reliabilities have been estimated for the Problems (.88 –.90) and Functioning (.86 –.87) subscales and the CORE-OM correlates with measures of psychological distress among clinical populations (Barkham et al., 2001).”