APPARENT SLIP FLOWS IN HYDROPHILIC AND HYDROPHOBIC MICROCHANNELS

By Chang‐Hwan Choi, K. Westin, K. Breuer. 2003

528 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Surfaces, Coatings and Films

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4539c4c8e0d4ba9a2a971f6f11f68339591606a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

In Mechanical Engineering

In Surfaces, Coatings and Films

Citations in the corpus

Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale (2005, methodology): “…pressure and/or flow rate relations were measured in capillaries Schnell, 1956; Churaev et al., 1984; Watanabe et al., 1999; Cheng and Giordano, 2002; Choi et al., 2003 and through nanopores Cheikh and Koper, 2003 , fluid velocity profiles were measured using micron-resolution particle image…”
Superhydrophobic drag reduction in laminar flows: a critical review (2016, background): “It is commonly agreed upon that the slip length on smooth hydrophobic surfaces is less than tens of nanometers while that on hydrophilic surfaces is effectively zero or undetectably small (Choi et al. 2003; Lauga et al. 2005; Neto et al. 2005).”
Influence of periodic wall roughness on the slip behaviour at liquid/solid interfaces: molecular-scale simulations versus continuum predictions (2006, methodology): “The molecular picture which has emerged, based on simplified statistical mechanical models ( Bocquet & Barrat 1994; Barrat & Bocquet 1999a, b; Priezjev & Troian 2004; Priezjev, Darhuber & Troian 2005) and MD simulations (Thompson & Robbins 1990a, b; Thompson, Brinckerhoff & Robbins 1993; Thompson, ”
A theoretical prediction of friction drag reduction in turbulent flow by superhydrophobic surfaces (2006, background): “The slip length achieved by a chemical treatment of the surface is usually less than 1 μm [2], while combination of hydrophobic surface with micro/nano structure (e.”
Slip on Superhydrophobic Surfaces (2010, background): “A number of studies have calculated slip lengths indirectly from pressure-drop (Choi et al. 2003, Schnell 1956) or friction-factor measurements (Baudry et al. 2001; Cottin-Bizonne et al. 2005; Zhu & Granick 2001, 2002) of simple ﬂuids ﬂowing past nonwetting smooth surfaces.”
Microfluidics: The no-slip boundary condition (2005, methodology): “In this context, the large number of recent published experiments reporting some form of (apparent) slip with λ ∼ 1 nm−1 μm in the flow of Newtonian liquids is surprising [9, 16, 17, 18, 29, 30, 32, 33, 38, 39, 40, 67, 87, 88, 68, 108, 116, 125, 126, 150, 162, 163, 178, 192, 193, 194, 195], and has ”
Boundary slip in Newtonian liquids: a review of experimental studies (2005, background): “Another category of experiments found explicit evidence of shear-dependent slip in hydrophobic microchannels and less clear evidences (due to the resolution limits of the technique) in hydrophilic microchannels [199].”