InterPro-an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites

By Nicola J. Mulder, Rolf Apweiler, T. Attwood, Amos Bairoch, Alex Bateman, David Binns, M. Biswas, Paul Bradley, Peer Bork, Philipp Bucher and 21 more. Bioinform., 2000

388 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45309caf57b08381133ee46272579bfc22050d54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

In Spectroscopy

Citations in the corpus

The RAVEN Toolbox and Its Use for Generating a Genome-scale Metabolic Model for Penicillium chrysogenum (2013, methodology): “There are now a number of tools available for automated annotation of genes [13,14].”
Deep Semantic Protein Representation for Annotation, Discovery, and Engineering (2018, methodology): “More recently, databases such as InterPro 13 and PROSITE 14 have aimed at integrating genomic features such as domain and functional site information from diverse databases into a single searchable user interface.”
Annotation of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome: a systematic review (2002, neutral): “Another link takes users to the results of automated BLASTP and InterProScan [ 72 ] analyses of the predicted peptides.”
Genome-scale models of bacterial metabolism: reconstruction and applications (2008, methodology): “…using complementary approaches: sequence homology with proteins of known function [stored for instance in UniprotKB (UniProt, 2008)], conservation of genomic structure with annotated species (e.g. synteny), and prediction of functional domains (Apweiler et al ., 2000; Claudel-Renard et al ., 2003).”
CELLO2GO: A Web Server for Protein subCELlular LOcalization Prediction with Functional Gene Ontology Annotation (2014, background): “However, if homologs for the protein of interest are not GO annotated or if a signature(s) and sequences similar to that of the query protein are not found in a relevant, searched database, such as InterPro [24], then a prediction cannot made.”
PANTHER version 6: protein sequence and function evolution data with expanded representation of biological pathways (2006, methodology): “The change helped us map better to the InterPro models (12,13), and facilitated the integration process of PANTHER to InterPro.”
The Pfam protein families database (2007, background): “Pfam is a member of the InterPro consortium (5) and has, like the other member databases, contributed annotation and families to the InterPro project.”
SUPERFAMILY: HMMs representing all proteins of known structure. SCOP sequence searches, alignments and genome assignments (2002, neutral): “InterPro ( 6 ) and CDD (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml).”