The general aggression model: Theoretical extensions to violence.
By C. Nathan DeWall, Craig A. Anderson, Brad J. Bushman. 2011
536 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Health, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/452de592fe3a02d0e73edc4ddbf6e55d5feebf24
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Health
In Social Psychology
- D. Dyck
- C. Ferguson
- S. M. Rueda
- Tobias Greitemeyer
- Dirk O. Mügge
- Pamela M. Kato
- Sonia Livingstone
- A. M. Hargrave
Citations in the corpus
- Protective Factors Against Extremism and Violent Radicalization: A Systematic Review of Research (2018, unknown): “One example is the General Aggression Model (Anderson & Bushman, 2002; DeWall, Anderson, & Bushman, 2011).”
- Paradigm change in aggression research: The time has come to retire the General Aggression Model (2012, background): “Nonetheless, GAM proponents themselves do this extension of the GAM to real-world violence (e.g., DeWall et al., 2011) without providing adequate empirical support for the utility of the GAM in such scenarios.”
- Climate Change and Psychology: Effects of Rapid Global Warming on Violence and Aggression (2019, unknown): “We already know of little things around the home that individuals can do to help alleviate greenhouse emissions and to reduce our carbon footprint [9] and the social sciences can help contribute to changing public attitudes about climate change.”
- On Defining Violence, and Why It Matters (2017, unknown): “Everyone agrees that acts that are intended to cause harm meet the intent criterion for violence (American Psychological Association, n.d.; Cook & Parrott, 2009; DeWall et al., 2011; Krug et al., 2002; Leeb et al., 2008; Parrott & Giancola, 2007).”