Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination

By F. Mechsner, Dirk Kerzel, Günther Knoblich, Wolfgang Prinz. Nature, 2001

669 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45134f2ac92a7fd09fdb0f8d7b6fb4cbed4eb62a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Michael J. Richardson
2. Richard C. Schmidt
3. Kerry L. Marsh
4. Stephan Patrick Swinnen
5. Richard B. Ivry
6. Jörn Diedrichsen
7. E. Hazeltine
8. Rebecca M. C. Spencer

In Social Psychology

1. Michael J. Richardson
2. Richard C. Schmidt
3. Kerry L. Marsh
4. Stephan Patrick Swinnen
5. Richard B. Ivry
6. Jörn Diedrichsen
7. Elisabeth Pacherie
8. Scott S. Wiltermuth

Citations in the corpus

• Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. (2007, background): “Taken together, this evidence indicates that stable coordination has less to do with the physical qualities of the coupling medium and more to do with whether the coupling provides the appropriate information about the movements in question (Bingham, 2004; Bingham, Schmidt, & Zaal, 1998; Meschner, ”
• A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective on Bimanual Coordination and Interference (2004, background): “Mechsner, Prinz, and their colleagues (Hommel et al. 2001; Mechsner et al. 2001) have favored this interpretation, arguing that the actions are coded in terms of expected sensory consequences.”
• Intermanual coordination: From behavioural principles to neural-network interactions (2002, background): “, or when feedback techniques integrate information from the respective limbs in a meaningful wa”