Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance
By María Bordons, M. T. Fernández, I. Gómez. Scientometrics, 2002
303 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44f20d5d906c8b46e1a831a1cd4793d9a9904760
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Journal status (2006, background): “This is true for the assessment of the impact of individual articles, journals, researcher s [8, 3, 12], research departments, universities and even countries [6, 5, 23, 13].”
- How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014, background): “…a limited aspect of quality (i.e. the impact on others’ scientific publication) (Martin & Irvin 1983; Bornmann & Leydesdorff 2013), their actual meaning has been broadly debated (Wouters 1999) and they also pose technical and conceptual limitations (Seglen 1997; Bordons, Fernandez & Gomez 2002).”