Body Weight of Wild and Captive Common Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)

By A. Araújo, M. F. Arruda, A. I. Alencar, F. Albuquerque, M. C. Nascimento, M. E. Yamamoto. International journal of primatology, 2000

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44d7440ae5e841cd6dbb30bed9bff102afbfe39e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. E. Price
2. Steve Stewart-Williams
3. Andrew G. Thomas

In Social Psychology

1. Steve Stewart-Williams
2. Andrew G. Thomas

Citations in the corpus

• Animal Domestication and Behavior (2003, background): “Araújo et al. (2000) noted that captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) are heavier than wild marmosets and cite improved diets and lack of physical activity as being responsible for the difference.”
• The Ape That Thought It Was a Peacock: Does Evolutionary Psychology Exaggerate Human Sex Differences? (2013, background): “Of course, there are also some monomorphic species, such as beavers and common marmosets, for which the sex difference in size is close to zero (Araújo et al., 2000; McKinstry & Anderson, 1998).”