Fast and slow contrast adaptation in retinal circuitry.

By Stephen A. Baccus, Markus Meister. 2002

537 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Swish: a Self-Gated Activation Function (2017, methodology): “For example, Baccus & Meister (2002) modeled the output of salamander ganglion cells with a linear unit followed by a pointwise activation function (“LN model”) and found that the latter attains a non-monotonic “U” shape.”
Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. (2007, background): “Recent work has revealed, however, that the contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is altered both during and after adaptation (Baccus and Meister 2002; Brown and Masland 2001; Chander and Chichilnisky 2001; Kim and Rieke 2001; Smirkanis et al. 1997; Rieke 2001).”
Mechanisms for Stable, Robust, and Adaptive Development of Orientation Maps in the Primary Visual Cortex (2013, background): “There is a wealth of experimental evidence supporting the idea that contrast-gain control first arises early in the visual pathway (e.g. Shapley and Victor, 1978; Baccus and Meister, 2002; Derrington and Lennie, 1984; Sclar, 1987; Alitto and Usrey, 2004; Truchard et al., 2000).”
Contrast Gain Control in Auditory Cortex (2011, unknown): “Such a hierarchy has been observed in the visual system, where at least both the retina and V1 engage separate gain control mechanisms (Carandini et al., 1997; Brown and Masland, 2001; Chander and Chichilnisky, 2001; Baccus and Meister, 2002).”
The Statistical Computation Underlying Contrast Gain Control (2006, unknown): “The other is contrast gain control, which operates in retina (Shapley and Victor, 1978, 1981; Chander and Chichilnisky, 2001; Baccus and Meister, 2002; Zaghloul et al., 2005), is strengthened in thalamus and visual cortex (Kaplan et al., 1987; Sclar, 1987; Sclar et al., 1990; Cheng et al., 1995),…”
The challenges natural images pose for visual adaptation. (2009, unknown): “Rapid contrast adaptation has two primary components: one produced within bipolar cells (Rieke, 2001; Brown and Masland, 2001; Baccus and Meister, 2002; Beaudoin et al., 2007) and another by spike generation in the ganglion cells (Rudd and Brown, 1996; Kim and Rieke, 2001; Zaghloul et al., 2005).”
Prediction and Decoding of Retinal Ganglion Cell Responses with a Probabilistic Spiking Model (2005, background): “Second, several studies (Smirnakis et al., 1997; Chander and Chichilnisky, 2001; Kim and Rieke, 2001; Baccus and Meister, 2002) have revealed slow contrast adaptation in RGCs, and integrateand-fire models can likewise exhibit a form of spike rate adaptation to stimulus variance (Rudd and Brown, 1997”
Multiple mechanisms for contrast adaptation in the retina. (2002, background): “In this issue of Neuron, Schummers, Mariñ o, and Sur Department of Neuroscience (”
The Suppressive Field of Neurons in Lateral Geniculate Nucleus (2005, background): “In particular, we cannot distinguish the fast mechanism of contrast gain control (Victor, 1987; Baccus and Meister, 2002; Mante et al., 2005; Zaghloul et al., 2005) from the slower mechanism of contrast adaptation (Chander and Chichilnisky, 2001; Kim and Rieke, 2001; Baccus and Meister, 2002;…”
Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? (2005, methodology): “…is completed within a cycle of the drifting grating, demonstrating that the gain control mechanisms operate in 100 ms (Enroth-Cugell and Shapley, 1973a; Saito and Fukada, 1986; Victor, 1987; Lankheet et al., 1993a; Yeh et al., 1996; Baccus and Meister, 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Mante et al., 2005).”
Functional mechanisms shaping lateral geniculate responses to artificial and natural stimuli. (2008, background): “In particular, we tested the possible impact of two such mechanisms: a mechanism of burst generation (Lesica and Stanley, 2004; Mukherjee and Kaplan, 1995; Sherman, 2001; Smith et al., 2000) and a mechanism of slow adaptation (Baccus and Meister, 2002; Demb, 2002; Solomon et al., 2004).”
Predictive Feedback Can Account for Biphasic Responses in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus (2009, background): “While predictive coding could work through local computations between neighboring neurons (providing a possible explanation for biphasic responses in the retina [13,46]), we argue that it would be computationally advantageous to (also) implement predictive operations through feedback projections.”