Contrast Gain Control in Auditory Cortex
By Neil C. Rabinowitz, Ben D. B. Willmore, Jan W. H. Schnupp, A. King. 2011
262 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Summary The auditory system must represent sounds with a wide range of statistical properties. One important property is the spectrotemporal contrast in the acoustic environment: the variation in sound pressure in each frequency band, relative to the mean pressure. We show that neurons in ferret auditory cortex rescale their gain to partially compensate for the spectrotemporal contrast of recent stimulation. When contrast is low, neurons increase their gain, becoming more sensitive to small changes in the stimulus, although the effectiveness of contrast gain control is reduced at low mean levels. Gain is primarily determined by contrast near each neuron's preferred frequency, but there is also a contribution from contrast in more distant frequency bands. Neural responses are modulated by contrast over timescales of ∼100 ms. By using contrast gain control to expand or compress the representation of its inputs, the auditory system may be seeking an efficient coding of natural sounds.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- David J. Heeger
- Tobias Brosch
- Matteo Carandini
- Heiko Neumann
- Xiao-Jing Wang
- Geoffrey E. Hinton
- Fred Henrik Hamker
- Frederik Beuth
Citations in the corpus
- Normalization as a canonical neural computation (2011, background): “There is also evidence for normalization in cortical areas that are devoted to other sensory modalities, and in particular in primary auditory corte”
- Computing with a Canonical Neural Circuits Model with Pool Normalization and Modulating Feedback (2014, background): “Other findings suggest that normalization occurs not only in early visual sensory processing but also in, auditory processing (Rabinowitz et al., 2011), attention mechanisms (Reynolds & Heeger, 2009; Treue, 2001), and decision making (Louie et al., 2011; Louie & Glimcher, 2012).”