Anger, Hatred, and the Quest for Peace: Anger Can Be Constructive in the Absence of Hatred

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Socio-psychological barriers to peace making: An empirical examination within the Israeli Jewish Society (2011, background): “…adapted from Plaks et al. (2001) (e.g. ‘Groups can’t really change their basic characteristics’) and more specific items that focused on the unique context of intergroup conflict (e.g. ‘Groups that are characterized by violent tendencies will never change their ways’) (see Halperin et al., 2011b).”
The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization: How Significance Quest Impacts Violent Extremism (2014, background): “The necessity of violence is premised on the notion that the enemy's responsibility for harm (to one's group) is fixed rather than malleable and stems from the target's essential nature (Dweck & Ehlinger, 2006; Halperin, Russell, Dweck & Gross, 2011; Medin, 1989; Yzerbyt, Rocher & Schadron, 1997).”
Why We Hate (2018, background): “…peace summit between Israelis and Palestinians show that inducing anger toward Palestinians increased support for making compromises in upcoming negotiations among those with low levels of hatred, but decreased support for compromise among those with high levels of hatred (Halperin et al., 2011).”
The Distinctive Effects of Empathy and Hope in Intractable Conflicts (2017, background): “For example, Halperin et al. (2011a) demonstrated that anger can lead to higher support for compromises in the absence of hatred within the context of an upcoming opportunity for peace.”