Economic Analysis of Agricultural Soil Carbon Sequestration: An Integrated Assessment Approach

By J. Antle, S. Capalbo, S. Mooney, E. T. Elliott, Keith Paustian. 2001

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44b6e55910bdc4c2c40ad7930cdec58aa3c14547

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Pete Smith
2. Uwe A. Schneider
3. Bruce A. McCarl
4. Michael Obersteiner
5. Daniel L. Martino
6. Z. Cai
7. F. Kraxner
8. D. Rokityanskiy

Citations in the corpus

• MEASURING ABATEMENT POTENTIALS WHEN MULTIPLE CHANGE IS PRESENT: THE CASE OF GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION IN U.S. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY (2002, unknown): “Fourth, we operate at a 63-region level while others [Antle et al. (2001b, 2002), Pautsch et al. (2001)] operate in regions over thousands of points.”
• Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture (2008, methodology): “…under cropland management, grassland management, set-aside/agroforestry/land-use change, organic soil management and restoration of degraded lands for all regions, except North America where the US soil carbon MAC was used (Antle et al. 2001; McCarl & Schneider 2001; Lee et al. 2005; US-EPA 2006).”
• Geographically explicit global modeling of land-use change, carbon sequestration, and biomass supply (2007, background): “[53] have created a similar coupled model that focuses on carbon sequestration in agricultural soil.”