The Economics of Biological Invasions

By A. Batabyal, Charles Perrings, M. Williamson, S. Dalmazzone. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2002

374 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Non‐native flora of Italy: Species distribution and threats (2010, background): “Besides its ecological impact, the spread of non-native species has negative, well-documented consequences on human health, as well as social and economic effects throughout the world (e.g. Mooney & Hobbs 2000; Perrings et al. 2000).”
Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations (2005, background): “cause major economic problems in agriculture and forestry (Perrings et al. 2000; Pimentel et al. 2000).”
Do invasive plants threaten the Sundarbans mangrove forest of Bangladesh (2007, background): “…subsequent intervention measures to control their spread are delayed (Biswas, 2003) the cost will be higher (Hobbs and Humphries, 1995; Kowarik, 1995; Mack et al., 2000; Silander and Klepeis, 1999) for the economy (Biswas, 2003; Perrings et al., 2000) and ecology (Rahman, 2003) of the Sundarbans.”
Mitigation and adaptation strategies for the control of biological invasions (2005, background): “E-mail address: cap8@york.ac.uk. pathogens such as HIV or SARS or on dpestsT whose economic costs in terms of morbidity, mortality, lost output in agriculture, forestry and fisheries, treatment and control are considerable (Perrings et al., 2000; Pimentel et al., 1999; in press).”