Anxiety, Processing Efficiency, and Cognitive Performance New Developments from Attentional Control Theory
By N. Derakshan, M. Eysenck. 2009
738 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/446ff292a6c8467ed11f18db0b777058d30f9d53
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Thorsten Roick
- Sofie Henschel
- D. Putwain
- Jean–Marc Dewaele
- Tsui Shan Ip
- N. Derakshan
- M. Eysenck
- Yair Bar-Haim
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Thorsten Roick
- Sofie Henschel
- D. Putwain
- Jean–Marc Dewaele
- Tsui Shan Ip
- N. Derakshan
- W. Symes
- M. Eysenck
Citations in the corpus
- When time slows down: The influence of threat on time perception in anxiety (2010, background): “Recent theoretical accounts suggest that cognitive performance deficits in anxiety result from disruption of the balance between bottom-up and top-down attention control processes (Derakshan & Eysenck, 2009; Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos, & Calvo, 2007).”
- The link between Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety, Second Language Tolerance of Ambiguity and Self-rated English proficiency among Chinese learners (2013, methodology): “If we accept M. W. Eysenck’s attentional control theory (Derakshan & Eysenck, 2009), which posits that trait anxiety creates a sort of divided attention task, consuming cognitive resources, then engagement of anxiety due to low SLTA seems likely to have negative effects on cognitively demanding…”
- Math Performance and Academic Anxiety Forms, from Sociodemographic to Cognitive Aspects: a Meta-analysis on 906,311 Participants (2021, background): “Another theoretical explanation for the negative impact of anxiety on performance is provided by the attentional control theory (Derakshan & Eysenck, 2009; Eysenck et al., 2007).”
- New perspectives in attentional control theory (2011, methodology): “This was followed by processing efficiency theory (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992), and more recently by attentional control theory (Derakshan & Eysenck, 2009; Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos, & Calvo, 2007).”
- The influence of negative affect on test anxiety and academic performance: An examination of the tripartite model of emotions (2017, background): “…the relationship between test anxiety and performance, such as impairment of workingmemory during preparation for an exam,which in turn reduces the cognitive resources available to perform a task (e.g., Derakshan & Eysenck, 2009; Eysenck & Calvo, 1992; Owens, Stevenson, Hadwin, & Norgate, 2012).”
- Do cognitive distortions mediate the test anxiety–examination performance relationship? (2010, background): “This analysis suggests that cognitive distortions would be associated with a debilitating effect on performance, consistent with the role of failure concerning cognitions interfering with working memory resources (Derakshan, Ansari, Hansard, Shoker, & Eysenck, 2009 ; Derakshan & Eysenck, 2009 ).”
- Relationships of mathematics performance, control and value beliefs with cognitive and affective math anxiety (2017, methodology): “…model, worrisome thoughts are assumed to exert the negative effect on performance by co-opting the limited resources of the working memory system, presumably in the central executive (Baddeley, 2001), which are otherwise used for task processing (Ashcraft & Kirk, 2001; Derakshan & Eysenck, 2009).”