Comparing stand inventories for large areas based on photo-interpretation and laser scanning by means of cost-plus-loss analyses

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Utility of Image-Based Point Clouds for Forest Inventory: A Comparison with Airborne Laser Scanning (2013, unknown): “, [14,60]).”
Airborne laser scanning as a method in operational forest inventory: Status of accuracy assessments accomplished in Scandinavia (2007, background): “In a Scandinavian context, laser-based methods are also competitive from an economical point of view (Eid et al., 2004).”
Predicting Tree Attributes and Quality Characteristics of Scots Pine Using Airborne Laser Scanning Data (2009, methodology): “…mean stand characteristics (Næsset 1997), pre-harvest inventories (Peuhkurinen et al. 2007), comparisons of forest inventories based on cost plus loss analysis (Eid et al. 2004), ecological studies (Omasa et al. 2003, Gaveau and Hill 2003) and assessments of forest growth issues (Yu et al. 2004).”
Combining ALS and NFI training data for forest management planning: a case study in Kuortane, Western Finland (2009, methodology): “It seems that the cost efficiency of an ALS-based inventory could be improved by using NFI training data, although more thorough economic analysis of different inventory techniques could be carried out by means of cost plus loss analysis (see Eid et al. 2004).”