An Evolutionary‐Psychological Approach to Self‐esteem: Multiple Domains and Multiple Functions
By Lee A. Kirkpatrick, Bruce J. Ellis. 2007
137 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4464f567fcb72e1fa6822d9dc1019c481e19d0b3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- M. Back
- Jens B. Asendorpf
- L. Penke
- David M. Buss
- J. Duntley
- P. Borkenau
- S. Schmukle
- Karoline A. Sachse
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Back
- L. Penke
- Jens B. Asendorpf
- David M. Buss
- J. Duntley
- S. Schmukle
- P. Borkenau
- Karoline A. Sachse
Citations in the corpus
- An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance (2013, unknown): “Our view resonates with models such as the “sociometer” model of self-esteem, which suggests that self-esteem can be thought of as a measure of one’s value to others (Kirkpatrick & Ellis 2001; Kirkpatrick et al. 2002; Leary & Baumeister 2000; Leary et al. 1995).”
- Why Mate Choices are not as Reciprocal as we Assume: The Role of Personality, Flirting and Physical Attractiveness (2011, background): “This self-perception can be conceptualized as a contextspecific ‘sociometer’, as it monitors one’s exclusion or inclusion on the mating market (mate value sociometer; Kavanagh, Robins, & Ellis, 2010; Kirkpatrick & Ellis, 2001; Penke & Denissen, 2008; Penke et al., 2007).”
- The evolution of intimate partner violence (2011, background): “There is some evidence that self-esteem tracks a person's self-perceptions of mate value (Kirkpatrick & Ellis, 2001).”