Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature.

By Edgar Erdfelder, Tina Auer, Benjamin E. Hilbig, André Aßfalg, Morten Moshagen, Lena Nadarevic. 2009

326 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/442cde9c4bbfc5bbb4347ddb6f844e862d4b1e7b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Joachim Vandekerckhove
2. D. Matzke
3. Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
4. Karl Christoph Klauer
5. Mandy Hütter
6. Jonathan Evans

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Joachim Vandekerckhove
2. D. Matzke
3. Karl Christoph Klauer
4. Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
5. Mandy Hütter
6. M. Janczyk
7. Heinrich R. Liesefeld
8. Birte U. Forstmann

Citations in the corpus

• Model Comparison and the Principle of Parsimony (2015, methodology): “For more information about MPTs, we recommend the review articles by Batchelder and Riefer (1999), Batchelder and Riefer (2007, pp. 24–32), and Erdfelder et al. (2009).”
• Applying processing trees in social psychology (2016, methodology): “General reviews of applications of MPT models are given by Batchelder and Riefer (1999) and Erdfelder et al. (2009).”