AFLP based alternatives for the assessment of Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability of sugar beet varieties

By J. de Riek, E. Calsyn, I. Everaert, E. van Bockstaele, M. De Loose. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2001

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

AFLP fingerprinting of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) cultivars: identification, genetic relationship and comparison of AFLP informativeness parameters (2007, background): “Dominant markers as AFLP have a maximum PIC of 0.5 when half of the accessions have the band and the other half does not have the band (De Riek et al. 2001).”
Data analysis for molecular characterization of plant genetic resources (2009, methodology): “Other proposed formulas are only simple derivation of the original Nei’s formula (as the proposed by De Riek et al. 2001 or by Roldan-Ruiz et al. 2000).”
PICcalc: An Online Program to Calculate Polymorphic Information Content for Molecular Genetic Studies (2012, background): “The maximum value of PIC and H for dominant markers is 0.5, since two alleles per locus are assumed and both are influenced by the number and frequency of the alleles (Henry 1997; De Riek et al. 2001; Bolaric et al. 2005).”
Suitability of mapped sequence tagged microsatellite site markers for establishing distinctness, uniformity and stability in aromatic rice (2004, unknown): “Similar studies on the use of molecular markers for DUS testing, although reported in a few other species (Riek et al., 2001; Bredemeijer et al., 2002; Röder et al., 2002) are lacking in aromatic rice and thus the examination of uniformity and stability in particular needs to be carried out on…”